Simranjeet Singh vs Anju on 11 January, 2018

116
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH

CR No. 8653 of 2017 (O/M)
Date of decision : 11.1.2018

Simranjeet Singh ……. Petitioner

Versus

Anju ……. Respondent

CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDIP SINGH

Present:- Mr. Vishal Yadav, Advocate, for petitioner.

1. Whether the Reporters of local newspaper may be allowed to
see the judgment ?

2. To be referred to the Reporter or not.

3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest ?

-.- -.-

KULDIP SINGH J. (ORAL)

Petitioner is aggrieved of the order dated 4.8.2017

(Annexure-P-4), passed by the learned District Judge, Family Court,

Barnala, vide which he was directed to pay Rs. 6,000/- per month as

maintenance pendent lite.

After hearing the learned counsel for petitioner, I am of the view

that keeping in view the prices of essential commodities, one can barely

survive with Rs. 6,000/- per month. There is no illegality or infirmity in the

quantum of maintenance, fixed by the Family Court, Barnala. Instant

revision is dismissed.

(KULDIP SINGH)
JUDGE

11.1.2018
sjks

Whether speaking / reasoned : Yes

Whether Reportable : No

1 of 1
15-01-2018 05:57:55 :::

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *