Sunil Kumar vs Sheetal on 17 January, 2018

CR-416-2016 (OM) 1

243
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH

CR-416-2016 (OM)
Date of decision : 17.01.2018

Sunil Kumar
… Petitioner(s)
Versus
Sheetal
… Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL

Present: None for the petitioner.

Mr. Amit Dhawan, Advocate
for the respondent.
****

AMIT RAWAL, J. (ORAL)

Learned counsel for the respondent-wife submits that the

present revision petition is arising out of order dated 01.12.2015 (Annexure

P-1), whereby the petitioner-husband was directed to pay maintenance

pendente lite @ ` 40,000/- p.m. in a petition under Section 24 of the Hindu

Marriage Act. The petition has been dismissed in default vide order dated

21.08.2017.

In view of above, no cause of action survives in the revision

petition and accordingly, the same is disposed of having rendered

infructuous.

( AMIT RAWAL)
17.01.2018 JUDGE
Yogesh Sharma

Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/ No

Whether Reportable Yes/ No

1 of 1
26-01-2018 07:29:45 :::

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *