IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CR No.6180 of 2017
Date of decision : 15.01.2018
Narinder Singh …Petitioner
Shallu Jaggi …Respondent
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL
Present: Mr. Parvez Chugh, Advocate for the petitioner.
ANIL KSHETARPAL, J. (ORAL)
Husband-petitioner is in the revision petition against the order
passed under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act fixing the maintenance
pendente lite at the rate of `10,000/- per month.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has vehemently argued that
the learned Court has wrongly assumed the income of the petitioner-
husband as `50,000/- per month, although, his salary is only `31,000/- per
Here is a case where wife is also maintaining the child. Taking
into consideration that fact, maintenance awarded is not unreasonable.
No ground for interference.
Revision petition is dismissed.
15.01.2018 (ANIL KSHETARPAL)
Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No
Whether reportable:- Yes/No
1 of 1
26-01-2018 08:11:35 :::