Somnath Pramanik & Ors vs Unknown on 29 January, 2018

1

95 29.01.2018

C.R.M. 740 of 2018
sg Ct. No.28
In Re: – An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the
(Allowed)
Code of Criminal Procedure filed on 24/01/2018 in connection with
Howrah Women P.S. Case No. 01/2018 dated 01.01.2018 under
Sections 498A/406/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

And

In the matter of: Somnath Pramanik Ors.

….petitioners
Mr. Mrityunjoy Chatterjee, Adv.

Mr. Joydeep Dutta, Adv.

…for the petitioners
Mr. M.R. Abedin, Adv.

…for the State

It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that there was a matrimonial dispute and the

victim left the matrimonial home out of her accord.

Learned lawyer for the State opposes the prayer for bail.

Having considered the materials in the case diary and in view of the fact that the

allegations of physical assault is not supported by medical papers, we are inclined in granting

anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

In the event of arrest, the petitioners shall be released on bail upon furnishing bond of

Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each with two sureties of like amount each to the

satisfaction of the arresting officer subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of

the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

The application for anticipatory bail is, accordingly, allowed.

Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied expeditiously

after complying with all necessary legal formalities.

(Rajarshi Bharadwaj, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)
2

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *