IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
Date of decision : 20.2.2018
Vijay Kumar ……. Petitioner
Heena ……. Respondent
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDIP SINGH
Present:- Ms. Nikhar Baranwal, Advocate for
Mr. Jitender Singh Dadwal, Advocate for the petitioner.
1. Whether the Reporters of local newspaper may be allowed to
see the judgment ?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not.
3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest ?
KULDIP SINGH J. (ORAL)
Impugned in the present revision petition is the order dated
16.12.2017, passed by learned Additional District Judge, Ludhiana vide
which in an application filed by Heena-respondent/wife was allowed
granting her Rs. 4000/- per month as maintenance pendente lite.
Keeping in view the present level of prices of essential
commodities, I am of the view that Rs. 4000/- per month as maintenance
pendente lite to the wife is inadequate.
There is no ground to reduce the said amount of maintenance
pendente lite awarded vide order dated 16.12.2017 by learned Additional
District Judge, Ludhiana.
Whether speaking / reasoned Yes
Whether Reportable: No
1 of 1
04-03-2018 14:45:43 :::