IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
T.A. No. 903-2017 (OM)
Date of decision : 23.2.2018
Leena ……. Petitioner
Gaurav Malhotra ……. Respondent
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDIP SINGH
Present:- Mr. Vaneet Kumar Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner.
1. Whether the Reporters of local newspaper may be allowed to
see the judgment ?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not.
3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest ?
KULDIP SINGH J. (ORAL)
As per office report, respondent has been served through father.
But no representation has been made on his behalf.
This is a petition filed under Section 24 of the Civil Procedure
Code, 1908 for transfer of the petition titled as ‘Gaurav Malhotra vs.
Leena’ filed under Section 25 of the Guardian and Wards Act, 1890,
pending in the Court of learned Guardian Judge/Civil Judge (Senior
Division), Ludhiana to a Court of competent jurisdiction at Chandigarh.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has pointed out that vide
order dated 27.10.2016, passed in TA No. 205 of 2016 (Annexure P-1),
divorce petition filed under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955,
filed by respondent-husband was transferred from Ludhiana to Chandigarh.
It is further stated that minor children is also living with petitioner-wife at
1 of 2
05-03-2018 09:49:41 :::
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the
petition titled as ‘Gaurav Malhotra vs. Leena’ filed under Section 25 of the
Judge/Civil Judge (Senior Division), Ludhiana is withdrawn from the said
Court and transferred to the Court of learned Guardian Judge/Civil Judge
(Senior Division), Chandigarh.
In view of above, petition stands allowed.
Whether speaking / reasoned Yes
Whether Reportable: No
2 of 2
05-03-2018 09:49:47 :::