SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Prof. Vidya Sagar Prasad & Anr vs State Of Bihar & Anr on 11 April, 2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.50026 of 2013
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -326 Year- 2010 Thana -NALANDA COMPLAINT CASE District-
NALANDA (BIHARSHARIFF)

1. Prof. Vidya Sagar Prasad S/O Late Bindeshwari Prasad Resident Of Hilsa (Town),
Police Station- Hilsa, District- Nalanda.

2. Manorama Devi @ Manorama Sinha W/O Prof. Vidya Sagar Prasad Resident Of
Hilsa (Town), Police Station- Hilsa, District- Nalanda …. …. Petitioners
Versus

1. The State Of Bihar

2. Madu Priya D/O Arun Kumar Sinha Resident Of Mohalla- Bhainsasur, Near
Telephone, Exchange, Police Station- Bihar Sharif, District- Nalanda.

…. …. Opposite Parties

Appearance :

For the Petitioners : Mr. Mukesh Kumar, Advocate
For the State : Mrs. Pushpa Sinha, APP

For the opp.party no.2 : Mr Rana Balgit Singh, Advocate

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD
ORAL JUDGMENT
Date: 11-04-2018

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, the State and the

opposite party no.2.

It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that the

allegations made out against the petitioners to are false as the

complainant has sustained injuries by falling in the bathroom and

taking advantage of such injuries she has implicated them in the

false case. It is also submitted that the petitioners are aged persons

and suffering from various illness.

Learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 opposes the

prayer made on behalf of the petitioners. It is also pointed out by the

learned counsel that vide orders dated 14.3.2018 and 6.4.2018,

passed in Cr.Misc.Nos. 10759/2012 and 49887/2013 respectively,
Patna High Court Cr.M isc. No.50026 of 2013 dt.11-04-2018

2/2

this Court has dismissed quashing applications of other accused

persons filed for quashing of cognizance order dated 11.6.2010.

Defence of the petitioners cannot be looked into by this

Court. It is also noticed that merely because the petitioners are

suffering from some illness, the criminal proceedings wherein

allegations have been levelled against them by the complainant,

cannot be quashed by this Court exercising jurisdiction under section

482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, even the plea of the

petitioners that they are ill, is taken to be true. This Court finds

sufficient material in the complaint before the learned Magistrate to

arrive at the conclusion regarding taking of the cognizance. As such,

this Court finds no infirmity in the order dated 11.6.2010, wherein

cognizance has been taken in Complaint Case No. 326C of 2010 for

the offence under sections 498A, 406, 323, 379, 504/34 of the Indian

Penal Code.

Considering the aforesaid submissions, the petition filed

under section 482 of the Cr.P.C. is dismissed.

(Madhuresh Prasad, J)
Shashi.

AFR/NAFR NAFR
CAV DATE NA
Uploading Date 12.4.2018
Transmission 12.4.2018
Date

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2018 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please CLICK HERE to read Rules of Group, If You agree then Message us on Above Number.

We handle Women centric biased laws like False 498A, Domestic Violence(DVACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA24, 125 CrPc, 307, 313, 376, 377, 406, 420, 506, 509 etc

Web Design BangladeshWeb Design BangladeshMymensingh