IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Appeal (SJ) No.1515 of 2018
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -276 Year- 2016 Thana -NANHPUR District- SITAM ARHI
1. Sita Saran Rai, S/o- Late Ramvilash Rai, Resident of- Gaura, Post- Gaura, P.S.-
Nanpur, District- Sitamarhi.
2. Yashoda Devi, W/o- Sita Sharan Rai, Resident of- Gaura, Post- Gaura, P.S.-
Nanpur, District- Sitamarhi.
…. …. Appellant/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
2. Deepmala Kumari, D/o- Thaga Paswan, resident of Village Post- Gaura, P.S.-
Nanpur, District- Sitamarhi.
…. …. Respondent/s
Appearance :
For the Appellant/s : Mr. Ram Kant Singh, Adv
For the Respondent/s : Mr. Binay Krishna, SPP
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR
ORAL JUDGMENT
Date: 14-05-2018
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
This is an appeal under Sections 14(A)(2) of the
Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of
Atrocities) Act, against refusal of the prayer for bail by the
learned Additional District Judge-I-cum-Special Judge SC/ST
Act, Sitamarhi in connection with Nanpur P.S.Case No. 276 of
2016 registered under Sections 498A,34 of the Indian Penal
Code, Section 3/4 of D.P.Act as well as under Sections 3(x) of
the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Act.
It appears that husband of respondent No.2, who is
co-accused in this case has already been allowed bail by a
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.1515 o f 2018 dt.14-05-2018
2
Coordinate Bench of this Court in Cr.Appeal (SJ) No.2141 of
2017. The appellants are relations of the husband. Allegation is
under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code and 3/4 of Dowry
Prohibition Act. Appellants are in custody since 30.01.2018.
Considering the aforesaid facts, let the appellants,
above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of
Rs.20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) each with two sureties of the
like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court-below
where the case is pending in connection with the aforesaid case,
with condition that the appellants shall fully cooperate with the
investigation/trial of the case, failing which the court below
shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the appe llants.
Accordingly, the appeal stands allowed.
(Birendra Kumar, J)
Nitesh/-
AFR/NAFR NAFR
CAV DATE NA
Uploading Date 16.05.2018
Transmission 16.05.2018
Date
