SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Prohibition Act vs In Re : Kartick @ Kartik Mondal on 11 May, 2018

1

11.05.2018
57

sdas
Rejected

C.R.M. 2217 of 2018

In Re.: An application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal
Procedure filed on 07.05.2018 in connection with Jalangi Police
Station Case No. 823 of 2017 dated 13.10.2017 under
Sections
498A/
304B of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry
Prohibition Act.

And
In Re : Kartick @ Kartik Mondal ….. petitioner

Mr. Sandipan Maity
… for the petitioner

Mr. S. G. Mukherjee, learned P.P.,
Ms. Amita Gaur
… for the State

Learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the

petitioner is in custody for 208 days and has been falsely implicated in

the instant case.

Learned Counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for

bail.

Having considered the materials in the case diary and bearing

in mind the allegations disclosing prima facie involvement of the

petitioner in torturing his wife who suffered unnatural death within 2

years of her marriage, we are of the opinion that this is not a fit case to

grant bail to the petitioner at this stage.
2

The application for bail is, thus, rejected.

(Ravi Krishan Kapur, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)
3

C.R.M. 192 of 2018

In Re.: An application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal
Procedure filed on 05.01.2018 in connection with Karimpur
Police Station Case No. 136 of 2012 dated 03.07.2012 under
Sections 420/467/468/471/120B of the Indian Penal Code.

And
In Re : Rabish Kumar Upadhyay ….. petitioner

Mr. Asraf Ali
… for the petitioner

Mr. Debojyoti Deb
… for the State

Having considered the materials on record prima facie

disclosing involvement of the petitioner in the alleged crime of

misappropriation of monies of the innocent depositors and the

fact that the petitioner has absconded for a protracted period of

time, we are not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this

stage.

The application for bail is, thus, rejected.

(Rajarshi Bharadwaj, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)
4

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2018 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please CLICK HERE to read Group Rules, If You agree then JOIN HERE

We handle Women centric biased laws like False 498A, Domestic Violence(DVACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA24, 125 CrPc, 307, 313, 376, 377, 406, 420, 506, 509 etc

Web Design BangladeshWeb Design BangladeshMymensingh