1
11.05.2018
57
sdas
Rejected
C.R.M. 2217 of 2018
In Re.: An application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal
Procedure filed on 07.05.2018 in connection with Jalangi Police
Station Case No. 823 of 2017 dated 13.10.2017 under Sections
498A/304B of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry
Prohibition Act.
And
In Re : Kartick @ Kartik Mondal ….. petitioner
Mr. Sandipan Maity
… for the petitioner
Mr. S. G. Mukherjee, learned P.P.,
Ms. Amita Gaur
… for the State
Learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the
petitioner is in custody for 208 days and has been falsely implicated in
the instant case.
Learned Counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for
bail.
Having considered the materials in the case diary and bearing
in mind the allegations disclosing prima facie involvement of the
petitioner in torturing his wife who suffered unnatural death within 2
years of her marriage, we are of the opinion that this is not a fit case to
grant bail to the petitioner at this stage.
2
The application for bail is, thus, rejected.
(Ravi Krishan Kapur, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)
3
C.R.M. 192 of 2018
In Re.: An application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal
Procedure filed on 05.01.2018 in connection with Karimpur
Police Station Case No. 136 of 2012 dated 03.07.2012 under
Sections 420/467/468/471/120B of the Indian Penal Code.
And
In Re : Rabish Kumar Upadhyay ….. petitioner
Mr. Asraf Ali
… for the petitioner
Mr. Debojyoti Deb
… for the State
Having considered the materials on record prima facie
disclosing involvement of the petitioner in the alleged crime of
misappropriation of monies of the innocent depositors and the
fact that the petitioner has absconded for a protracted period of
time, we are not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this
stage.
The application for bail is, thus, rejected.
(Rajarshi Bharadwaj, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)
4
