1
14-05-2018
Sl. no.93
Ct. No. 6
aks..
C.O. 4761 of 2016
Ruma Kundu
Vs.
Sajal Kundu
Mr. Shibaji Kumar Das
…. for the petitioner.
Despite service, none appears to contest the application under Section 24
of the Code of Civil Procedure.
This is an application under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure at
the instance of the wife praying for transfer of Mat Suit No. 45 of 2016
(previously numbered as Mat Suit 519 of 2016). It is the case of the petitioner
that under compulsion, the petitioner has been presently residing at Baranagar
with her brother. The petitioner has no source of income and therefore she has
been in great financial constraint. With this financial constraint, it is difficult for
her to travel to Burdwan to attend the proceedings of the matrimonial suit which
has been instituted by the husband. The petitioner has stated that from
Baranagar to the court of Burdwan, she has to travel at least 130 k.m. in one
way and because of her financial stringency, it is not possible for her to look after
the case and, ultimately, if that is going to happen, she will be seriously
prejudiced. That apart, it has been further stated that there are two other
2
proceedings – one under Section 498A/323/34 of the Indian Penal Code and the
other one is a proceeding under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure
pending at Barrackpore court. Both the said two proceedings are being contested
by the husband at Barrackpore. The petitioner has made an averment that her
husband is an employee of a Bank. He is presently working for gain as a Manager
in Deutsche Bank having its office at Shakespeare Sarani, Kolkata and earns
handsome salary.
Having considered the averments made in the petition and the materials
disclosed by the petitioner in the application under Section 24 of the Code of Civil
Procedure and having considered the convenience and inconvenience of the
parties, this court is of the view that it will be of great inconvenience for the wife
to attend the matrimonial suit in the court of the learned District Judge,
Burdwan.
It is a settled law that inconvenience of the wife is of paramount
consideration for disposal of an application under Section 24 of the Code of Civil
Procedure. Such principle has already been decided by this court earlier in a
decision in the case of Pampa Banerjee Vs. Shri Mridul Banerjee, reported in
2017(1) WBLR (Cal) 30.
In view of the above, I am of the firm opinion that the present matrimonial
suit should be transferred in a place which will be convenient for the wife to
attend.
Accordingly, I direct that Mat Suit No. 45 of 2016 ( previously numbered as
Mat Suit 519 of 2016) be withdrawn from the court of the learned Additional
3
District Sessions Judge, 4th Court, Burdwan and be placed before the learned
Additional District Judge, Barrackpore, 24-Parganas (North) within whose
territorial jurisdiction the petitioner resides at present.
The application being C.O.4761 of 2016 is, thus, disposed of.
( Sahidullah Munshi, J)