1
162 11.06.2018
rkd Ct. No.28 C.R.M. 3529 of 2018
(Allowed)
In Re: – An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of
the Code of Criminal Procedure filed on 07/06/2018 in
connection with Arambagh P.S. Case No. 221 of 2018 dated
21/04/2018 under Sections 147 /148 /447 /323 /325 /498A
/406 /420 /504 /34 of the Indian Penal Code.
And
In the matter of: Subal Chandra Dutta Ors.
….petitioners.
Mr. Sk. A. Jafor
…for the petitioners.
Ms. K. Mitra
…for the State.
It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that the
incident arose out of a dispute between the defacto complainant
and the petitioners and his relations including his children
arising from an earlier marriage.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State opposes
the prayer for anticipatory bail.
Having considered the materials in the case diary and
bearing in mind the nature of allegations in the light of the
aforesaid submissions made on behalf of the petitioners, we are
of the opinion that custodial interrogation of the petitioners is
not necessary and they may be granted anticipatory bail.
In the event of arrest, the petitioners shall be released on
bail upon furnishing a Bond of Rs. 10,000/- each with two
sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer
and also subject to the conditions as laid down under Section
438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and on further
condition that petitioner nos.1, 2 6 shall meet the investigating
officer once in a week until further orders.
The application for anticipatory bail is, thus, disposed of.
(Ravi Krishan Kapur, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)