In Re:- Haradhan Das @ Rabindra … vs Re: An Application For Bail Under … on 12 April, 2017

1

31 12.4.2017

C.R.M. No.3017 of 2017
p.d.

In re:- Haradhan Das @ Rabindra Nath Das …. Petitioner.

-And-

Re: An application for bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. affirmed on 6.4.2017 in connection with
Khejuri Police Station Case No.10/2014 dated 14.1.2014 under Sections 498A/494/302/201/120B of the
Indian Penal Code read with Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.
Mr. Asis Sanyal,
Mr. Saibal Mondal … For the petitioner.

Mr. Arun Kumar Maity, A.P.P.,
Ms. Mayukhi Mitra …. For the State.

Heard the learned Advocates appearing on behalf of the parties.

Perused the case diary.

The petitioner is in custody for 200 days.

It appears that about five months back, the petitioner’s prayer

for bail was rejected by a Co-ordinate Bench on merit by a detailed order.

No case is made out from the side of the petitioner, which may

justify us to reconsider the petitioner’s prayer for bail once again on the

self-same materials.

Having regard to above, this application for bail stands rejected.

However, since we find that after submission of the charge

sheet, there has been no progress in the trial, we direct the learned

Magistrate, before whom the matter is now pending, to commit the case to

the Court of Sessions for trial within two weeks from date without any

further delay.

The learned Counsel for the petitioner shall have the liberty to

obtain the certified copy of this order and to communicate the same to the

court below.

2

Office is directed to supply the urgent certified copy of this order

to the learned Counsel for the parties at an early date.

(Ashim Kumar Roy, J.)

(Amitabha Chatterjee, J.)

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *