CRM No.M-32459 of 2016 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH
1. Crl. Misc. No.M- 32459 of 2016(OM)
Date of Decision: April 5 , 2017.
Parshant Nath Sharma …… PETITIONER(s)
Versus
State of Haryana …… RESPONDENT (s)
2. Crl. Misc. No. M- 32475 of 2016(OM)
Neelam Sharma and others …… PETITIONER(s)
Versus
State of Haryana …… RESPONDENT (s)
CORAM:- HON’BLE MRS.JUSTICE LISA GILL
Present: Mr. Abhishek Sanghi, Advocate
for the petitioners.
Mr. Anmol Malik, AAG, Haryana.
Mr. Manoj Kumar Sood, Advocate
for the complainant.
*****
1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see
the judgment?
2. To be referred to the reporters or not?
3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest?
*****
LISA GILL, J.
This order shall dispose of Criminal Misc. No.M-32459 of 2016
(Parshant Nath Sharma v. State of Haryana) and Criminal Misc. No.M-32475
1 of 2
09-04-2017 16:15:02 :::
CRM No.M-32459 of 2016 2
of 2016 (Neelam Sharma and others v. State of Haryana). The petitioners in
both these petitions pray for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners in FIR
No.316 dated 08.08.2016 under Sections 323/498A/406/506/34 IPC registered
at Police Station Old Faridabad.
It is submitted that during the pendency of these petitions, the
matter has been amicably resolved between the petitioner in CRM No.M-32459
of 2016 – Parshant Nath Sharma and the complainant i.e. his wife. Photocopy
of settlement dated 05.04.2017 reflecting the terms and conditions thereof,
produced in Court today is taken on record subject to just exceptions. Parties
have decided to part ways. The complainant does not wish to proceed against
any of the petitioners in the abovesaid FIR in view of the settlement.
Learned counsel for the complainant as well as the State have no
objection in case the concession of anticipatory bail is granted to the
petitioners. It is submitted that petitioners in both the cases have joined
investigation pursuant to interim orders passed by this Court.
Keeping in view the aforementioned facts but without commenting
upon or expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, these petitions are
allowed. Consequently, orders dated 15.09.2016 in both the abovesaid petition
are made absolute.
( LISA GILL )
April 5 , 2017. JUDGE
‘om’
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No
Whether reportable: Yes/No
2 of 2
09-04-2017 16:15:03 :::