Ankit Gupta vs State Of Haryana on 31 March, 2017

CRM No.M-44894 of 2016 [1]

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANAAT
CHANDIGARH

Criminal Misc. No.M- 44894 of 2016(OM)
Date of Decision: March 31 , 2017.

Ankit Gupta …… PETITIONER (s)

Versus

State of Haryana …… RESPONDENT (s)

CORAM:- HON’BLE MRS.JUSTICE LISA GILL

Present: Petitioner in-person.

Complainant – Ms. Shilpi Gupta.

SI Jaswinder Kaur, Police Station Women, Panchkula.
*****
1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see
the judgment?
2. To be referred to the reporters or not?
3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest?
*****

LISA GILL, J.

The petitioner prays for bail pending trial in FIR No.0071 dated

29.10.2016 under Sections 323/406/498A/506/377/180 IPC registered at Police

station Women Police Station, Panchkula.

As per the report from the Mediation and Conciliation Centre of

this Court, the parties have amicably resolved their dispute. Petitioner Ankit

Gupta as well as the complainant Ms. Shilpi Gupta are present in Court. They

are duly identified by SI Jaswinder Kaur, Police Station Women, Panchkula.

1 of 2
09-04-2017 05:25:27 :::
CRM No.M-44894 of 2016 [2]

The petitioner as well as the complainant, who are present in

Court, submit that the terms and conditions of the settlement have been

reduced into writing on 27.03.2017. Copy of the settlement/agreement is

attached with this file.

The complainant Ms. Shilpi Gupta submits that the matter has

been resolved amicably between the parties and she has no objection in case

the petitioner is afforded the concession of bail pending trial. The parties have

READ  Vinod @ Vinay vs State on 16 May, 2017

decided to part ways. It is further submitted that in terms of the settlement

arrived at between the parties, a petition for quashing of the abovesaid FIR

No.0071 dated 29.10.2016 shall be filed by the parties.

The petitioner in this case was admitted to interim bail for a period

of two months vide order dated 31.01.2017. During the interregnum, the parties

have amicably resolved their entire dispute.

Keeping in view the facts and circumstances as above but without

commenting upon or expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this

petition filed by Ankit Gupta is allowed. The interim bail granted to the

petitioner pursuant to order dated 31.01.2017 shall enure pending trial subject

to his furnishing fresh bail bonds and surety bonds to the satisfaction of the

learned Trial Court.

( LISA GILL )
March 31 , 2017. JUDGE
‘om’

Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No
Whether reportable: Yes/No

2 of 2
09-04-2017 05:25:28 :::

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *