Captain Ajit Singh vs State on 9 May, 2017

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 79 / 2017
Captain Ajit Singh Balyan S/o Anil Kumar Balyan, Aged About 27
Years, R/o 76, G.c. Tower, Amrald Heights, Ram Prasta Green,
Sector 7, Vaishali, Distt. Gajiyabad. (UP).

—-Petitioner
Versus
State of Rajasthan

—-Respondent
__
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Nadish Singhvi.
For Respondent(s) : Mr. M.S. Panwar, P.P. for the State.
__
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE P.K. LOHRA
Order
09/05/2017

Accused-petitioner has filed this petition under Section 482

Cr.P.c. for seeking undermentioned directions:

“It is therefore prayed that, this petition may
kindly be allowed and a direction be issued to
Additional magistrate (PCPNDT) (SD) Jodhpur
Metro to conclude the trial of criminal case
No.6/2014 within 6 months. Any other relief
favorable to the petitioner may kindly be granted”

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that trial

against petitioner for offence under Sections 498A 406 IPC is

pending before Special Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate

(P.C.P.N.D.T.) Act, Jodhpur Metropolitan (for short, ‘learned trial

Court’) for last almost three years. It is also argued by learned

counsel that so far there is no material progress in the trial

inasmuch as only one prosecution witness has been examined.

(2 of 2)
[CRLMP-79/2017]

Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor submits that no general

directions can be issued for expediting trial.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties, in my opinion,

no specific directions can be issued to learned trial Court for

expediting trial in the matter. However, it is expected of the

learned trial Court to proceed with trial as expeditiously as

READ  Hanmant Dada Bhosale-vs-The State Of Maharashtra on 20 January, 2004

possible and conclude the same at the earliest.

(P.K. LOHRA)J.

Twinkle/52

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *