Ramdas Swami vs Unknown on 12 May, 2017

1

610/CL
12.05.2017

rrc
(Allowed)

C.R.M. 3529 of 2017
In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of
the Code of Criminal Procedure.

In the matter of : 1. Ramdas Swami

2. Smt. Bina Pani Swami

3. Arvind Swami

4. Rajni Swami
……petitioners
Mr. C. R. Chakraborty
Mr. M. A. Rahaman
…For the petitioners
Ms. Suvasree Patel
…..For the State

Apprehending arrest in course of investigation of

Muchipara Police Station F.I.R. No. 355 of 2016 dated 9th

October, 2016 under Sections 341/323/379/114 of the Indian

Penal Code, subsequently amended under Sections

498A/406/354/323/379/114 of the Indian Penal Code, the

petitioners have applied for anticipatory bail.

We have heard learned advocates for the parties and

perused the materials in the case diary. Considering the

statement of the victim recorded under Section 164 of the Code

of Criminal Procedure, we are of the considered view that

custodial interrogation of the petitioners is not necessary for

effective and meaningful progress of investigation of the F.I.R.,

and that they are entitled to direction as prayed for in this

application.

2

The application, thus, stands allowed with the direction

that in the event of arrest, the petitioners shall be released on

bail upon furnishing bond of Rs.5,000/- each, with two

sureties of like amount each, one of whom must be local, to the

satisfaction of the arresting officer and also subject to the

conditions as laid down in sub-section (2) of Section 438 of the

Code of Criminal Procedure.

READ  vs Unknown on 29 May, 2017

(Debi Prosad Dey, J.) (Dipankar Datta, J.)

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *