ORDER XXXIV – Civil Procedure Code 1908

Civil Procedure Code 1908

 

 

ORDER XXXIV. SUITS RELATING TO MORTGAGES OF IMMOVABLE PROPERTY

 

1. Parties to suits for foreclosure sale and redemption.

 

Subject to the provisions of this Code, all persons having an interest either in the mortgage-security or in the right of redemption shall be joined as parties to any suit relating to the mortgage.

 

Explanation—A puisne mortgagee may sue for foreclosure or for sale without making the prior mortgagee a party to the suit; and a prior mortgage need not be joined in a suit to redeem a subsequent mortgage.

 

1[2. Preliminary decree in foreclosure suit

 

(1) In a suit for foreclosure, if the plaintiff succeeds, the Court shall pass a preliminary decree—

 

(a) ordering that an account be taken of what was due to the plaintiff at the date of such decree for—

 

(i) principal and interest on the mortgage,

 

(ii) the costs of suit, if any, awarded to him, and

 

(iii) other costs, charges and expenses properly incurred by him up to that date in respect of his mortgage-security, together with interest thereon; or

 

(b) declaring the amount so due at that date, and

 

(c) directing—

 

(i) that, if the defendant pays into Court the amount so found or declared due on or before such date as the Court may fix within six months from the date on which the Court confirms and countersigns the account taken under clause (a), or from the date on which such amount is declared in Court under clause (b), as the case may be, and thereafter pays such amount as may be adjudged due in respect of subsequent costs, charges and expenses as provided in rule 10, together with subsequent interest on such sums respectively as provided in rule 11, the plaintiff shall deliver up to the defendant, or to such person as the defendant appoints, all documents in his possession or power relating to the mortgaged property, and shall, if so required, re-transfer the property to the defendant at his cost free from the mortgage and from all incumbrances created by the plaintiff or any person claiming under him, or, where the plaintiff claims by derived title, by those under whom he claims, and shall also, if necessary, put the defendant in possession of the property; and

 

(ii) that, if payment of the amount found or declared due under or by the preliminary decree is not made on or before the date so fixed, or the defendant fails to pay, within such time as the Court may fix the amount adjudged due in respect of subsequent costs, charges, expenses and interest, the plaintiff shall be entitled to apply for a final decree debarring the defendant from all right to redeem the property.

 

(2) The Court may, on good cause shown and upon terms to be fixed by the Court, from time to time, at any time before a final decree is passed, extend the time fixed for the payment of the amount found or declared due under sub-rule (1) or of the amount adjudged due in respect of subsequent costs, charges, expenses and interest.

 

(3) Where, in a suit for foreclosure, subsequent mortgagees or persons deriving title from, or subrogated to the rights, of any such mortgagees are joined as parties, the preliminary decree shall provide for the adjudication of the respective rights and liabilities of the parties to the suit in the manner and form set forth in Form No. 9 or Form No. 10 as the case may be, of Appendix D with such variations as the circumstances of the case may requ
ire.]

 

1. Subs. by Act 21 of 1929, sec. 4, for rule 2.

 

HIGH COURT AMENDMENTS

 

Orissa.-Same as in Patna.

 

Patna.-In Order XXXIV, in rule 2, sub-rule (2), after the words “The Court may”, insert the words “of its own motion or”:

 

[Vide Notification No. 1-R, dated 7th January, 1936.]

 

1[3. Final decree in foreclosure suit

 

(1) Where, before a final decree debarring the defendant from all right to redeem the mortgaged property has been passed, the defendant makes payment into Court of all amounts due from him under sub-rule (1) of rule 2, the Court shall, on application made by the defendant in this behalf, pass a final decree—

 

(a) ordering the plaintiff to deliver up the documents referred to in the preliminary decree, and, if necessary—

 

(b) ordering him to re-transfer at the cost or the defendant the mortgaged property as directed in the said decree, and also, if necesssary—

 

(c) ordering him to put the defendant in possession of the property.

 

(2) Where payment in accordance with sub-rule (1) has not been made, the Court shall, on application made by the plaintiff in his behalf, pass a final decree declaring that the defendant and all persons claiming through or under him or debarred from all right to redeem the mortgaged property and also, if necessary ordering the defendant to put the plaintiff in possession of the property.

 

(3) On the passing of a final decree under sub-rule (2), all liabilities to which the defendant is subject in respect of the mortgage or on account of the suit shall be deemed to have been discharged.]

 

1. Subs. by Act 21 of 1929, sec. 4, for rule 3.

 

1[4. Preliminary decree in suit for sale

 

(1) In a suit for sale, if the plaintiff succeeds, the Court shall pass a preliminary decree to the effect mentioned in clauses (a), (b) and (c) (i) of sub-rule (1) of rule 2, and further directing that, in default of the defendant paying as therein mentioned, the plaintiff shall be entitled to apply for a final decree directing that the mortgaged property or a sufficient part thereof be sold, and the proceeds of the sale (after deduction therefrom of the expenses of the sale) be paid into Court and applied in payment of what has been found or declared under or by the preliminary decree due to the plaintiff, together with such amount as may have been adjudged due in respect of subsequent costs, charges, expenses and interest, and the balance, if any, be paid to the defendant or other persons entitled to receive the same.

 

(2) The Court may, on good cause shown and upon terms to be fixed by the Court, from time to time, at any any time before a final decree for sale is passed, extend the time fixed for the payment of the amount found or declared due under sub-rule (1) or of the amount adjudged due in respect of subsequent costs, charges, expenses and interest.

 

(3) Power to decree sale in foreclosure suit—In a suit for foreclosure in the case of an anomalous mortgage, if the plaintiff succeeds, the Court may, at the instance of any party to the suit or of any other person interested in all mortgage-security or the right of redemption, pass a like decree (in lieu of a decree for foreclosure) on such terms as it thinks fit, including the deposit in Court of a reasonable sum fixed by the Court to meet the expenses of the sale and to secure the performance of the terms.

 

(4) Where, in a suit
for sale or a suit for foreclosure in which sale is ordered, subsequent mortgagees or persons deriving title from, or subrogated to the rights of, any such mortgagees are joined as parties, the preliminary decree referred to in sub-rule (1) shall provide for the adjudication of the respective rights and liabilities of the parties to the suit in the manner and form set forth in Form No. 9, Form No. 10 or Form No. 11, as the case may be, of Appendix D with such variations as circumstances of the case may require.]

 

HIGH COURT AMENDMENTS

 

Allahabad.- In Order XXXIV, in rule 4, in sub-rule (2), after the words “The Court may”, insert the words “of its own motion, or”.

 

[Vide Notification No. 4084/35(a)-3(7), dated 24th July, 1926.].

 

Calcutta.- In Order XXXIV, in rule 4, renumber sub-rules (3) and (4) as sub-rules (4) and (5) respectively and insert the following sub-rule, namely.-

 

“(3) The Court may in its discretion direct in the decree for sale that if the proceeds of the sale are not sufficient to pay the mortgage debet, the mortgagor shall pay the balance personally.”

 

1. Subs. by Act 21 of 1929, sec. 4, for rule 4.

 

1[5. Final decree in suit for sale

 

(1) Where, on or before the day fixed or at a time before the confirmation of a sale made in pursuance of a final decree pass under sub-rule (3) of this rule, the defendant makes payment into Court of amounts due from him under sub-rule (1) of rule 4, the Court shall, on applicatl made by the defendant in this behalf, pass final or, if such decree has passed, order—

 

(a) ordering the plaintiff to deliver up the documents referred to in the prelimina decree, and if necessary—

 

(b) ordering him to transfer the mortgaged property as directed in the said decre and, also, if necessary—

 

(c) ordering him to put the defendant in possession of the property.

 

(2) Where the mortgaged property or part thereof has been sold in pursuance c a decree passed under sub-rule (3) of this rule, the Court shall not pass an order und< sub-rule (1) of this rule, unless the defendant in addition to the amount mentione in sub-rule (1), deposits in Court for payment to the purchaser a sum equal to fiv per cent, of the amount of the purchase-money paid into Court by the purchaser.

 

Where such deposit has been made, the purchaser shall be entitled to an order fo repayment of the amount of the purchase-money paid into Court by him, togethe with a sum equal to five per cent thereof.

 

(3) Where payment in accordance with sub-rule (1) has not been made, the Cour shall, on application made by the plaintiff in this behalf, pass a final decree directinj that the mortgaged property or a sufficient part thereof be sold, and that the proceed: of the sale be dealt with in the manner provided in sub-rule (1) of rule 4.]

 

HIGH COURT AMENDMENTS

 

Andhra Pradesh.-Same as in Madras.

 

Kerala.-Same as in Madras, (w.e.f. 9-6-1959)

 

Madras.-In Order XXXIV, in rule 5, in sub-rule (3), after the words “plaintiff in this behalf”, insert the words “and after notice to all parries”.

 

[Vide ROC No. 4955-B-1 of 1930.]

 

1. Subs. by Act 21 of 1929, sec. 4, for rule 6.

 

6. Recovery of balance due on mortgage in suit for sale.

 

Where the ne proceeds of any sale held under 1[rule 5] are found insufficient to pay the amouni due to the plaintiff, the Court, on application by him may, if the balance is legall> recoverable from the defendant otherwise than out of the property sold, pass a decree for such balance.

 

1. Subs, by Act No. 104 of 1976 for “the last preceding rule” (w.e.f. 1-2-1977).

 

1[7. Preliminary decree is redemption suit.

 

(1) In a suit for redemption, if the plaintiff succeeds, the Court shall pass a preliminary decree—

 

(a) ordering that an account be taken of what was due to the defendant at the date of such decree for—

 

(i) principal and interest on the mortgage,

 

(ii) the costs of suit, if any, awarded to him, and

 

(iii) other costs, charges and expenses properly incurred by him up to the date, in respect of his mortgage-security, together with interest thereon; or

 

(b) declaring the amount so at that date; and

 

(c) directing—

 

(i) that, if the plaintiff pays into Court the amount so found or declared due on or before such date as the Court may fix within six months from the date on which the Court confirms and countersigns the account taken under clause (a), or from the date on which such amount is declared in Court under clause (b), as the case may be, and thereafter pays such amount as may be adjudged due in respect of subsequent costs, charges and expenses and provided in rule 10, together with subsequent interest on such sums respectively as provided in rule 11, the defendant shall deliver up to the plaintiff, or to such person as the plaintiff appoints all documents in his possession or power relating to the mortgaged property, and shall, if so required, retransfer the property to the plaintiff at his cost free from the mortgage and from all incumbrances created by the defendant or any person claiming under him where the defendant claims by derived title, by those under whom he claims, and shall also, if necessary put the plaintiff in possession of the property; and

 

(ii) that, if payment of the amount found or declared due under or by the preliminary decree is not made on or before the date so fixed, or the plaintiff fails to pay, within such time as the Court may fix, the amount adjudged due in respect of subsequent costs, charges expenses and interest, the defendant shall be entitled to apply for a final decree—

 

(a) in the case of a mortgage other than a usufructuary mortgage, a mortgage by conditional sale, or an anomalous mortgage the terms of which provide for foreclosure only and not for sale, that the mortgage property be, sold, or

 

(b) in the case of a mortgage by conditional sale or such an anomalous mortgage as aforesaid, that the plaintiff be debarred from all right to redeem the property.

 

(2) The Court may, on good cause shown and upon terms to be fixed by the Court, from time to time, at any time before the passing of a final decree for foreclosure of sale, as the case may be, extend due in respect of subsequent costs, charges, expenses and interest.

 

1. Subs. by Act 21 of 1929, sec. 4, for rule 7.

 

8. Final decree in redemption suit

 

(1) Where, final decree debarring the plaintiff from all right to redeem the mortgaged property has been passed or before the confirmation of a sale held in pursuance of a final decree passed under sub-rule (3) of this rule, the plaintiff makes payment into Court of all amounts due from him under sub-rul
e (1) of rule 7, the Court shall, on application made under by the plaintiff in this behalf, pass a final decree or, if such decree has been passed, an order—

 

(a) ordering the defendant to deliver up the documents referred to in the preliminary decree, and, if necessary,—

 

(b) ordering him to re-transfer at the cost of the plaintiff the mortgaged property as directed in the said decree, and also, if necessary,—

 

(c) ordering him to put the plaintiff in possession of the property.

 

(2) Where the mortgaged property or a part thereof has been sold in pursuance of a decree passed under sub-rule (3) of this rule, the Court shall not pass an order under sub-rule (1) of this rule, unless the plaintiff in addition to the amount mentioned is sub-rule (1), deposits in the Court for payment to the purchaser a sum equal to five per cent, of the amount of the purchase-money paid into by the purchaser.

 

Where such deposit has been made, the purchaser shall be entitled to an order for repayment of the amount of the purchase-money paid into Court by him, together with a sum equal to five per cent, thereof.

 

(3) Where payment in accordance with sub-rule (1) has not been made, the Court shall, on application made by the defendant in this behalf,—

 

(a) in the case of a mortgage by conditional sale or of such an anomalous mortgage as is hereinbefore referred to in rule 7, pass a final decree declaring that the plaintiff and all persons claiming under him are debarred from all right to redeem the mortgaged property and, also, if necessary, ordering the plaintiff to put the defendant in possession of the mortgaged property; or

 

(b) in the case of any other mortgage, not being a usufructuary mortgage, pass a final decree that the mortgaged property or a sufficient part thereof be sold, and the proceeds of the sale (after deduction therefrom of the expenses of the sale) be paid into Court and applied in payment of what is found due to the defendant, and the balance, if any, be paid to the plaintiff or other persons entitled to receive the same.

 

3[8A. Recovery of balance due on mortgage in suit for redemption

Where the net proceeds of any sale held under 1[rule 8] are found insufficient to pay the amount due to the defendant, the Court,2[on application by him in execution], may, if the balance is legally recoverable from the plaintiff otherwise than out of the property sold, pass a decree for such balance.]

 

1. Subs. by Act No. 104 of 1976 for “the last proceeding rule” (w.e.f. 1-2-1977).

 

2. Subs. by Act No. 104 of 1976 for “on application by him” (w.e.f. 1-2-1977).

 

3. Ins. by Act 21 of 1929, sec. 5.

 

9. Decree where nothing is found due or where mortgagee has been overpaid

 

Notwithstanding anything hereinbefore contained, if it appears, upon taking the account referred to in rule 7, that nothing is due to the defendant or that he has been overpaid, the Court shall pass a decree directing the defendant, if so required, to re-transfer the property and to pay to the plaintiff and amount which may be found due to him; and the plaintiff shall, if necessary, be put in possession of the mortgaged property.

 

2[10. Costs of mortgagee subsequent to decree

 

In finally adjusting the amount to be paid to a mortgagee in case of a foreclosure, sale or redemption, the Court shall, unless in the case of costs of the suit the conduct of the mortgagee has been such as to disentitle him thereto, add to
the mortgage-money such costs of the suit and other costs, charges and exepenses as have been properly incurred by him since the date of the preliminary decree for foreclosure, sale or redemption up to the time of actual payment:

 

1[Provided that where the mortgagor, before or at the time of the institution of the suit, tenders or deposits the amount due on the mortgage, or such amount as is not substantially deficient in the opinion of the Court, he shall not be ordered to pay the costs of the suit to the mortgagee and the mortgagor shall be entitled to recover his own costs of the suit from the mortgagee, unless the Court, for reasons to be recorded, otherwise directs.]

 

1. Ins. by Act No. 104 of 1976 (w.e.f. 1-2-1977).

 

2. Subs. by Act 21 of 1929, sec. 6, for rule 10.

 

1[10A. Power of Court to direct mortgagee to pay mesne profits

 

Where in a suit for foreclosure, the mortgagor has, before or at the time of the institution of the suit, tendered or deposited the sum on the mortgage, or such sum as is not substantially deficient in the opinion of the Court, the Court shall direct the mortgagee to pay to the mortgagor mesne profits for the period beginning with the institution of the suit.]

 

1. Ins. by Act No. 104 of 1976 (w.e.f. 1-2-1977).

 

HIGH COURT AMENDMENT

 

Bombay.-In Order XXXIV, for rule 10A, substitute the following rule, namely:-

 

“10A. Costs of mortgaged subsequent to decree.-In mortgage suit where under the mortgage the possession of the mortgaged property is with the mortgagee, the mortgagor may tender or deposit, before or at the time of the institution of the suit, or during the pendency of the same, the sum due on the mortgage. The tender by the mortgagor must be in writing. Notice of any such deposit shall be given by the Court to mortgagee. If the sum so tendered or deposited is in the opinion, of the Court, substantially sufficient to satisfy the mortgage, the Court shall direct the mortgagee to pay to the mortgagor, mesne profits as may be determined from the date of such tender or notice of deposit till the actual delivery of possession by the mortgagee to the mortgagor.”

 

[Vide Notification No. P.O. 102/77, dated 31st December, 1987.]

 

1[11. Payment of interest

 

In any decree passed in a suit for foreclosure, sale or redemption, where interest is legally recoverable, the Court may order payment of interest to the mortgagee as follows, namely:—

 

(a) interest up to the date on or before which payment of the amount found or declared due is under the preliminary decree to be made by the mortgagor or other person redeeming the mortgage—

 

(i) on the principal amount found or declared due on the mortgage,—at the rate payable on the principal, or, where such rate at the Court deems reasonable, and

 

(ii) [Sub-clause (ii) Omitted by Act 66 of 1956, sec. 14 (w.e.f. 1-1-1957)].

 

(iii) on the amount adjudged due to the mortgagee for costs, charges and expenses properly incurred by the mortgagee in respect of the mortgagee-security up to the date of the preliminary decree and added to the mortgage-money,—at the rate agreed between the parties, or, failing such rate, at such rate not exceeding six per cent, per annum as the Court deems reasonable; and

 

(b) subsequent interest up to the date of realisation or actual payment on the aggregate of the principal sums specified in clause (a) as calculated in accordance with that clause
at the such rate as the Court deems reasonable.]

 

1. Subs. by Act 21 of 1929, sec. 6, for rule 11.

 

12. Sale of property subject to prior mortgage

 

Where any property the sale of which is directed under this Order is subject to a prior mortgage, the Court may, with the consent of the prior mortgagee, direct that the property be sold free from the same, giving to such prior mortgagee the same interest in the proceeds of the sale as he had in the property sold.

 

13. Application of proceeds

 

(1) Such proceeds shall be brought into Court and applied as follows:—

first, in payment of all expenses incident to the sale or properly incurred in any attempted sale;

 

secondly, in payment of whatever is due to the prior mortgagee on account of the prior mortgage, and of costs properly incurred in connection therewith;

 

thirdly, in payment of all interest due on account of the mortgage is consequence whereof the sale was directed, and of the costs of the suit in which the decree directing the sale was made;

 

fourthly, in payment of the principal money due on account of that mortgage; and

 

lastly, the residue (if any) shall be paid to the person proving himself to be interested in the property sold, or if there are more such persons than one, then to such persons according to their respective interests therein or upon their joint receipt.

 

(2) Nothing in this rule or in rule 12 shall be deemed to affect the powers conferred by section 57 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 (4 of 1882).

 

14. Suit for sale necessary for bringing mortgaged property to sale.

 

(1) Where a mortgagee has obtained a decree for the payment of money in satisfaction of a claim arising under the mortgage, he shall not be entitled to bring the mortgaged property to sale otherwise than by instituting a suit for sale in enforcement of the mortgage, and he may institute such suit notwithstanding anything contained in 1 Order II, rule 2.

 

(2) Nothing in sub-rule (1) shall apply to any territories to which the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 (4 of 1882), has not been extended.

 

HIGH COURT AMENDMENTS

 

Bombay.-In Order XXXIV, after rule 14, insert the following rule, namely:-

 

“14A. Special provisions regarding a composite decree combining in itself a preliminary as well as a final decree.-(1) Notwithstanding anything hereinbefore contained, where the sale of any mortgaged property is decreed under any composite decree which combines in itself a preliminary as well as a final decree as per compromise between the parties or as required or permissible under any special law or under an order, award or adjudication which is deemed to be a decree of a Civil Court, or which is required to be executed as a decree or as if it is a decree of a Civil Court, and the judgment-debtor (mortgagor), before the day fixed in that behalf or at any time before the confirmation of the sale made in pursuance of such decree, order, award or adjudication, makes payment into Court of all amounts due from him to the decree-holder (mortgagee) on the date under the said decree, order, award or adjudication including all subsequent costs, charges, expenses and interest, and also deposits in Court for payment the purchaser a sum equal to five per cent, of the amount of the purchase money paid into Court by the purchaser, the Court shall, on application made by the judgment-debtor (mortgagor) in this behalf, set aside the sale and mark the decree, order, awa
rd or adjudication as satisfied, and pass in order-

 

(a) ordering the decree-holder (mortgagee) to deliver up to the judgment-debtor (mortgagor) or his nominee, all documents in the possession or power relating to the mortgaged property and if necessary.

 

(b) ordering him to retransfer to mortgaged property to the judgment-debtor (mortgagor) or his nominee at his cost free from the mortgage and from all incumbrances created by the decree-holder (mortgagee), or any person claiming under him, or where the decree-holder (mortgagee) claims by derived title, by those under whom he claims, and also if necessary.

 

(c) ordering him to put the judgment-debtor (mortgagor) or his nominee in possession of the property.

 

(2) Where such deposit has been made, purchaser shall be entitled to an order for repayment of the amount of the purchase money paid into Court by him together with a sum equal to five per cent, thereof.

 

(3) The Court may, upon good cause shown and upon terms to be fixed by the Court, from time to time at any time before the sale is confirmed extend the time fixed for the payment of the amount due under the decree, under, award of adjudication, including all subsequent costs, charges, expenses and interest.” (w.e.f. 1-10-1983)

 

Kerala.-In Order XXXIV, in rule 14, omit sub-rule (2).

 

[Vide Notification No. Bl-3312/58, dated 7th April, 1959.]

 

3[15. Mortgages by the deposit of title deeds and charges

 

1[(1)] All the provisions contained in this Order which apply to a simple mortgage shall, so far as may be, apply to a mortgage by deposit of title-deeds within the meaning of section 58, and to a charge within the meaning of section 100 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 (4 of 1882);

 

2[(2) Where a decree orders payment of money and charges it on immovable property on default of payment, the amount may be realised by sale of that property in execution of that decree.]

 

1. Renumbered as sub-rule (1) of rule 15 by Act No. 104 of 1976, sec. 82 w.e.f. 1-2-1977).

 

2. Ins. by Act No. 104 of 1976 (w.e.f. 1-2-1977).

 

3. Subs. by Act 21 of 1929, sec. 7, for rule 15.

 

HIGH COURT AMENDMENTS

 

Allahabad.-In Order XXXIV.-

 

(a) renumber rule 15 as sub-rule (1) thereof, and

 

(b) after sub-rule (1), as so renumbered, insert the following sub-rule, namely:-

 

“(2) Where a decree orders payment of money and charges it on immovable property on default of payment, the amount may be realised by sale of that property in execution of that very decree.” (w.e.f. 17-1-1953)

 

Kerala.-For Order XXXIV, substitute the following Order, namely:-

 

“ORDER. XXXIV SUITS RELATING TO MORTGAGES OF IMMOVABLE PROPERTY

 

1. Parties to suits for foreclosure, sale and redemption.-Subject to the provisions of this Code, all persons having an interest either in the mortgage-security or in the right of redemption shall be joined as parties to any suit relating to the mortgage.

 

Explanation.-A puisne mortgagee may sue for foreclosure or for sale without making the prior mortgagee a party to the suit; and a prior mortgagee need not be joined in a suit to redeem a subsequent mortgage.

 

2. Decree in foreclosure suit.-(1) In a suit for foreclosure
, if the plaintiff succeeds, the Court shall pass a decree-

 

(a) declaring the amount due to the plaintiff on date of such decree for-

(i) principal and interest on the mortgage;

 

(ii) the costs of the suit, if any, awarded to him; and

 

(iii) other costs, charges and expenses properly incurred by him up to that date in respect of his mortgage security, together with interest thereon; and

 

(b) directing-

 

(i) that, if the defendant pays into Court the amount so declared due with future interest and subsequent costs as are mentioned in Rule 7 on a day within six months from the date of the decree to be fixed by the Court, the plaintiff shall deliver up to the defendant, or to such persons as he appoints, all documents f, in his possession or power relating to the mortgaged property, and shall, if so required, re-transfer the property to the defendant at the cost of the defendant free from the mortgage and from all encumbrances created by the plaintiff or any person claiming under him or, where the plaintiff claims by derived title by those under whom he claims, and shall also, if necessary, put the defendant in possession of the property; but

 

(ii) that, if such payment is not made on or before the day fixed by the Court, the defendant and-all persons claiming through or under him shall be debarred from all rights to redeem the property; and also if necessary the defendant shall put the plaintiff in possession of the property.

 

(2) Where, in a suit for foreclosure, subsequent mortgagees or persons deriving title from, or surrogated to the right of, any such mortgagees are joined as parties, the Court shall adjudicate upon the respective rights and liabilities of all the parties to the suit in the manner and form set forth in Form No. 9 or Form No. 10, as the case may be; of Appendix D with such variations as the circumstances of the case may require.

 

(3) On the expiry of the date fixed for payment of the amount declared due to the mortgagee, all liabilities to which the defendant is subject in respect of the mortgage or on account of the suit shall be deemed to have been discharged.

 

3. Decree in suit for sale.~(i) In a suit for sale, if the plaintiff succeeds, the Court shall pass a decree to the effect mentioned in clauses (a) and (b) (i) of rule 2 (1) and also directing that, in default of the defendant paying as therein mentioned, the mortgaged property or a sufficient part thereof be sold, and that the proceeds of the sale (after deducting therefrom the expenses of the sale) be applied in payment of what is declared due to the plaintiff as aforesaid, together with subsequent interest and subsequent costs, and that the balance,/if any be paid to the defendant or other persons entitled to receive the same; and that, in case the proceeds of such sale be insufficient to pay the amount due to the plaintiff, the balance, if legally recoverable from the defendant otherwise than out of the property sold be paid by the defendant personally.

 

(ii) In a suit for foreclosure, if the plaintiff succeeds and the mortgage is an anomalous mortgage, the Court may, at the instance of the plaintiff or of any other person interested either in the mortgage money or in the right of redemption, pass a like decree (in lieu of a decree for foreclosure) on such terms as it thinks fit, including the deposit in Court of a reasonable sum fixed by the Court to meet the expenses of the sale and to secure the performance of the terms.

 

(iii) Where in a suit for sale or a suit for foreclosure in which sale is ordered, subsequent mortgagees or persons deriving title from or subrogated to the rights of, any such mortgagees are joined as parties the Court shall adjudic
ate upon the respective rights and liabilities of all the parties to the suit in the manner and form set forth in Form No. 9, From No. 10 or Form No. 11, as the case may be, of Appendix D, with such variations as the circumstances of the case may require.

 

2. Decree in foreclosure suit.-(1) In a suit for foreclosure, if the plaintiff succeeds, the Court shall pass a decree-

 

(a) declaring the amount due to the plaintiff on date of such decree for-

 

(i) principal and interest on the mortgage;

 

(ii) the costs of the suit, if any, awarded to him; and

 

(iii) other costs, charges and expenses properly incurred by him up to that date in respect of his mortgage security, together with interest thereon; and

 

(b) directing-

 

(i) that, if the defendant pays into Court the amount so declared due with future interest and subsequent costs as are mentioned in Rule 7 on a day within six months from the date of the decree to be fixed by the Court, the plaintiff shall deliver up to the defendant, or to such persons as he appoints, all documents in his possession or power relating to the mortgaged property, and shall, if so required, re-transfer the property to the defendant at the cost of the defendant free from the mortgage and from all encumbrances created by the plaintiff or any person claiming under him or, where the plaintiff claims by derived title by those under whom he claims, and shall also, if necessary, put the defendant in possession of the property; but

 

(ii) that, if such payment is not made on or before the day fixed by the Court, the defendant and .-all persons claiming through or under him shall be debarred from all rights to redeem the property; and also if necessary the defendant shall put the plaintiff in possession of the property.

 

(2) Where, in a suit for foreclosure, subsequent mortgagees or persons deriving title from, or surrogated to the right of, any such mortgagees are joined as parties, the Court shall adjudicate upon the respective rights and liabilities of all the parties to the suit in the manner and form set forth in Form No. 9 or Form No. 10, as the case may be; of Appendix D with such variations as the circumstances of the case may require.

 

(3) On the expiry of the date fixed for payment of the amount declared due to the mortgagee, all liabilities to which the defendant is subject in respect of the mortgage or on account of the suit shall be deemed to have been discharged.

 

3. Decree in suit for sale.-(i) In a suit for sale, if the plaintiff succeeds, the Court shall pass a decree to the effect mentioned in clauses (a) and (b) (i) of rule 2 (1) and also directing that, in default of the defendant paying as therein mentioned, the mortgaged property or a sufficient part thereof be sold, and that the proceeds of the sale (after deducting therefrom the expenses of the sale) be applied in payment of what is declared due to the plaintiff as aforesaid, together with subsequent interest and subsequent costs, and that the balance, any be paid to the defendant or other persons entitled to receive the same; and that, in case the proceeds of such sale be insufficient to pay the amount due to the plaintiff, the balance, if legally recoverable from the defendant otherwise than out of the property sold be paid by the defendant personally.

 

(ii) In a suit for foreclosure, if the plaintiff succeeds and the mortgage is an anomalous mortgage, the Court may, at the instance of the plaintiff or of any other person interested either in the mortgage money or in the right of redemption, pass a like decree (in lieu of a decree for foreclosure) on such terms as it thinks fit, including the deposit in Court of a reasonable s
um fixed by the Court to meet the expenses of the sale and to secure the performance of the terms.

 

(iii) Where in a suit for sale or a suit for foreclosure in which sale is ordered, subsequent mortgagees or persons deriving title from or subrogated to the rights of, any such mortgagees are joined as parties the Court shall adjudicate upon the respective rights and liabilities of all the parties to the suit in the manner and form set forth in Form No. 9, From No. 10 or Form No. 11, as the case may be, of Appendix D, with such variations as the circumstances of the case may require.

 

4. Decree in suit for redemption.-In a suit for redemption, if the plaintiff succeeds, the Court shall pass decree-

 

(a) declaring the amount due to the defendant at the date of such decree for-

 

(i) principal and interest on the mortgage;

 

(ii) the costs of the suit, if any, awarded to him; and

 

(iii) other costs, charges and expenses properly incurred by him up to that date in respect of his mortgage security, together with interest thereon; and

 

(b) directing-

 

(i) that, if the plaintiff pays into Court the amount so declared due with subsequent interest and costs as are mentioned in Rule 7, on a day within six months of the decree to be fixed by the Court, the defendants shall deliver up to the plaintiff, or to such person as he appoints, all documents in his possession or power relating to the mortgaged property, and shall if so required, re-transfer the property to the plaintiff at his cost, free from the mortgage and from all encumbrances created by the defendant or any person claiming under him, or, where the defendant claims by derived title, by those under whom he claims, and shall, if necessary, put the plaintiff in possession of the property; and

 

(ii) that, if such payment is not made on or before the date so fixed, the plaintiff shall in the case of a mortgage by conditional sale or an anomalous mortgage the terms of which provide for foreclosure only and not for sale, be debarred from all rights to redeem the property and also, if necessary, put the defendant in possession of the mortgaged property; and that if desired by the defendant in the suit itself, in the case of any mortgage other than an usufructuary mortgage, a mortgage by conditional sale or such an anomalous mortgage as aforesaid the mortgaged property or a sufficient portion thereof be sold and the proceeds of the sale (after deducting therefrom the expenses of the sale) be applied in payment of what is found due to the defendant, and the balance, if any, be paid to the plaintiff or other persons entitled to receive the same and that, in case the net proceeds of such sale be insufficient to pay the amount due to the defendant, the balance be paid by the plaintiff personally if the balance is legally recoverable from the plaintiff otherwise than out of the property sold.

 

5. Date of payment.-The Court may, upon good cause shown and upon such terms, if any, as it thinks fit, postpone the date fixed for payment under this Order from time to time.

 

6. Decree where nothing is found due or where mortgage has been overpaid.- Notwithstanding anything herein before contained, if it appears in a redemption suit that nothing is due to the defendant or that he has been overpaid, the Court shall pass a decree directing the defendant if so required, to re-transfer the property and to pay to the plaintiff the amount which may be found due to him; and the plaintiff shall, if necessary, be put in possession of the mortgaged property.

 

7. Costs of mortgagee subsequent to decree.-In finally adjusting the amount to be paid to a mortgagee in case of a foreclosure, sale or redemption,
the Court shall, unless the conduct of the mortgagee has been such as to disentitle him to costs, add to the mortgage money such costs of the suit and other costs, charges and expenses, as have been properly incurred by him since the decree for foreclosure, sale or redemption up to the time of actual payment.

 

8. Sale of property subject to prior mortgage,-Where any property the sale of which is directed under this Order is subject to a prior mortgage the Court may, with the consent of the prior mortgagee, direct that the property be sold free from the same giving to such prior mortgagee the same interest in the proceeds of the sale as he had in the property sold.

 

9. Application of proceeds.-

 

(i) Such proceeds shall be brought into Court and applies as follows:-

First, in payment of all expenses incident to the sale or properly incurred in any attempted sale;

 

Secondly, in payment of whatever is due to the prior mortgagee on account of the prior mortgage, and costs, properly incurred in connection therewith;

 

Thirdly, in payment of all interest due on account of the mortgage in consequence whereof the sale was directed, and of the costs of the suit in which the decree directing the sale was made;

 

Fourthly, in payment of the principal money due on account of the mortgage; and

 

Lastly, the residue, if any, shall be paid to the person proving himself to be interested in the property sold, or if there are more such persons than one, then to such persons according to their respective interests therein or upon their joint receipt.

 

(ii) Nothing in this rule or in Rule 8 shall be deemed to affect the powers conferred by section 57 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882.

 

10. Suit for sale necessary for bringing mortgaged property to sale.-Where a mortgagee has obtained a decree for the payment of money in satisfaction of a claim arising under the mortgage, he shall not be entitled to bring the mortgaged property to sale otherwise than by instituting a suit for sale in enforcement of the mortgage, and he may institute such suit notwithstanding anything contained in Order II rule 2.

 

11. Mortgages by the deposit of title-deeds and charges.-All the provisions contained in this Order which apply to a simple mortgage shall, so far as may be, apply to a mortgage by deposit of title-deeds within the meaning of section 58 and to a charge within the meaning of section 100 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882.”

 

[Vide Kerala Gazette, Pt. III, No. 46, dated 20th November, 1990.]

 

 

Previous | Next

 

Civil Procedure Code 1908

 

Indian Laws – Bare Acts

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *