Some time back, United States of America was on the lookout for weapons of mass destruction (WMD) in Iraq, which it assumed, the country may use on itself or on its allies. These WMD can destroy all life instantly. But the American military did not find any so called WMD in Iraq. Well, in reality, these WMDs are not in Iraq but in INDIA. These are called Weapons of Men Destruction.

Most of these WMDs are proposed and designed by NCW ( National Commission for women ) and WCD ( Ministry for Women and Child development ) with one goal in mind i.e. to harass and blackmail men and ruin their careers and financial positions, so they cannot lead a happy life and die inch by inch every day. These Indian WMDs are worse than the so called Iraqi WMDs because WMDs of Iraq can kill people instantly  but these Indian WMDs are meant  for slow death.

You may wonder which are these Indian WMDs.

1st Place goes to IPC 498A (DP3) also known as Dowry Law: Under this law, one word by a wife is enough to land husband in jail without any formal investigation. She can name anyone along with her husband, like his old parents, brothers, sisters, friends, neighbors, relatives and even servants. There are many news reports of even police arresting a 4 month old breast feeding baby under this law. Any daughter in law can file a false case and there is no punishment for filling false cases and burden of showing proof lies on men. Police, Judges and Lawyers knows about this misuse, but for them it is a money making opportunity and these cases go on for not less than 5 years minimum. These Police and Lawyers suck men blood by harassing them ruin their career, and  if man is in a government  job he will lose his job as its criminal case, non bailable and non-compoundable. Under this Act, there is a 5 year punishment for giving dowry, but to date, no women or her family has been arrested for giving dowry. They report the case, only when the marriage is sore and on the brink of divorce. This Law was enacted in 1984.

2nd Place goes to Domestic Violence Act (PWDVA), this was enacted in 2006. Under this Law, daughter in law can file case on any male member of husband family, saying she was harassed mentally and physically. We have proof that some women have even filed a case just because she was asked to make tea for her husband and his friends. Under this law she can name any male members or husband’s friends even if she has never met or seen them before and the police will take action on them. Burden of proof lies on men. In today’s world, cooking and cleaning is considered to be harassment for women and today, most of the women do not know how to cook. Some have never been to the kitchen or do not even know where the kitchen is. They think their husband is a FREE ATM machine and he has to pay all her bills. That is his responsibility and he has no right to question what she is doing, where or with whom she is going and if questioned or the flow of money is reduced will be resulted in domestic violence false case.

3rd Place goes to Maintenance (HMA). If man wants a Divorce, then he has to maintain his wife,  that’s Law; but In India, even if a women runs away with her lover or she want out of marriage siting some above False cases, the court will force the man to pay her. Most of the time, courts do not verify whether a man is capable to pay as much as women demand or he has that much source of income or not. There are judgments even on unemployed men; the court imposes maintenance by force. In one of Bombay HC case, the court forced the man to pay for the illegitimate child too. Here the women are not wrong to have illegitimate child, but if a man stop his wife from meeting her lover that leads to harassment. One Gujarat judgment says married women have the right to enjoy life outside marriage.

Divorce: women can file a case for divorce siting any of above false cases or, even when she gets caught red handed with her lover, she can blame husband for this situation. With Divorce, she will get add-on package as interim maintenance and the man has to pay her for no fault of his. She will get divorce within a year. But for men, there are limited options for divorce, he has no supporting laws to file false cases as above, even if his wife has run away with her lover and to prove that she will not come back, he has to wait for 7 years.

Child Custody: Out of 10,000 custody cases only 1 or 2 fathers get his custody of his child. The law says the father is a natural guardian; well that’s only in the law books. In reality, he never gets custody of his child. If women is a prostitute or has deserted her child and goes abroad, she will get custody of her child by default. Till the age of 5, even the father has no right to ask for his child custody, but he has to pay for the child support only. This law is designed to make money for women from her husband, so the law gives her default custody till the child is 5 years, so women can raise her child and brainwash the child to hate his / her Father.

Outraging modesty (354 IPC): any women can file a case on any man for no reason and men are arrested without any formal investigation. Burden of proof lies on men,  but if a woman does the same thing, a man has no supporting laws to protect him.

Above are already existing WMDs, but there are many more in NCW / WCD menu.

Marital Rape: A wife can have consensual sex with her husband and the next day,  she can report it to the police that she was raped by him.

Marital Cruelty: Promising a women to marry her later and then get married to someone else, leads to cruelty to her. But if a woman does the same to a man, that’s not a cruelty to him.

Sexual Harassment at work Place: If a male employee shows or tells something which is even work related to a woman,  she can report it to the police as sexual harassment for her. Man should not show that she is wrong, or If a female employee does not like some male employee, she can file a case against him simply to harass him and the burden of proof lies on men. Recently a women army major filed a case on her seniors, later she was proved wrong, but she did not have to compensate them for a  year of false accusation or punishment for filing a false case.

Accusation:  In various accusation men and women file accusations to each other, in family related matters mostly Divorce / maintenance / Custody most of the time court hardly verify these minor accusations. In divorce cases, women can state in her petition to make her case stronger, that her husband was having affair, even if in reality, she was caught red handed having an extra marital affair. For women, no proof is required to write anything, but if man says something,  it is regarded as harassment to her and NCW demands punishment for such accusation.

LIST OF SOME Laws (CRIMINAL) Misused by WOMEN

MISCARRIAGE

Causing Miscarriage 312 IPC Non Cognizable 3 to 7 yrs.

Causing Miscarriage without consent 313 IPC Cognizable. Life or 10 yrs.

Death caused while causing miscarriage without Woman’s Consent 314 IPC Cognizable. 10 yrs. or Life

Act done to prevent child being born alive or to cause it to be after birth 315 IPC Cognizable 10 yrs.

KIDNAPPING

Kidnapping 363 IPC Cognizable. 7 yrs.

Kidnapping women to compelmarriage, seduced to illicit inter course, etc. 366 IPC Cognizable. 10 yrs.

Procuration of minor girl under 18 years 366-A IPC Cognizable. 10 yrs.

Importation of girl 366-B IPC Cognizable. 10 yrs.

SEXUAL ASSAULT

Punishment for Rape or Life time376 IPC Cognizable 7 to 10 yrs.

Intercourse by a man with him during Separation 376-A IPC Cognizable 2 yrs. & Fine

Intercourse by public servant with woman in his custody 376-B IPC Cognizable 5 yrs. & Fine

Intercourse by Superintendent of jail, remand home, etc. 376-C IPC Cognizable 5 yrs. & Fine

Intercourse by any member of the management or staff of a hospital with any woman in that hospital 376-D IPC Cognizable 5 yrs. & Fine

Unnatural Offences-carnal intercourse 377 IPC Cognizable Life or 10 yrs.

MARRIAGE

Cohabitation caused by deceitfully inducing her under belief of lawful marriage 493 IPC Non-Cognizable 10 yrs.

Marrying again during life time of wife (away for 7 yrs.) 494 IPC Cognizable 7 yrs.

Going through unlawful marriage ceremony496 IPC Cognizable 7 yrs.

Enticing, detaining a during women with criminal intention 498 IPC Cognizable 2 yrs.

CRUELTY

Abetment of suicide 306 IPC Cognizable 10 yrs. & Fine

Cruelty by Husband or Relatives-Mental or physical 498 A IPC Cognizable 3 yrs.

Uses indecent language or behaves in a disorderly committed in manner in a public street the Presence or public place of police (KP Act – Karnataka Police Act) 92 -(o)- K.P.Act Cognizable if Fine of Rs.100

Uses in any street abusive or insulting words or affixes or exhibits any indecent, threatening abusive or insulting paper or drawing with intent to provoke 92 -(r)-K.P.Act -do- -do5

MODESTY

Outraging modesty, use of criminal force with intention to outrage her modesty 354 IPC Cognizable 2 yrs.

Outraging modesty by Uttering gesture, sound 509 IPC Cognizable 1 yrs.

DOWRY HARASMENT

Dowry Death: -(Death of 304-B-IPC Cognizable 7 yrs. to Life

A woman is caused by otherwise than normal circumstances within 7 years of her marriage and it is shown that soon before the death she was subjected to cruelty or harassment by her husband or relative for, or in connection with, any demand for dowry)

Penalty for giving or taking Dowry (D.P.Act) 3 Dry.Pro.Act. Cognizable 5 yrs. & Fine

Penalty for demanding Dowry (D.P.Act) Dry.Pro.Act. Cognizable 6 months to 2 yrs. & Fine

IMMORAL TRAFFIC

Punishment for living on the earnings of prostitution,Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act Cognizable 2 yrs. or Fineor Both

Procuring inducing or taking woman or girl for the sake of prostitution Immoral Traffic (Prevent) Action Cognizable 3 to 7 yrs. &Fine

Detaining a woman or girl in premises where Action prostitution is carried on. Immoral Traffic (Prevent) Cognizableto 10 yrs. &Fine

Seduction of a woman or girl in custody Immoral Traffic (Prevent) Action Cognizable 7 yrs. or Life.& Fines

All above laws are misused widely, Women herself runaway with Boy then later claim she was kidnapped, Have sex and claim sexually harassed or raped and Burdon lies on men to prove her wrong and that take years, and even man says truth no one believe and women Lies all Believe in her. Man has to Prove with Proofs and for women just word and some crocodile tears are enough.

These Laws are very cleverly drafted without leaving any option for man to prove women is wrong or sue if misused and sure slow Death.

FASCIST GENDER LAW MAKING IN INDIA

The Sexual Harassment Workplace Bill (SHWB) is a textbook example of how public opinion was trampled by some people with vested interest

The SHWB is recent bill where overwhelming public opinion was ignored by the WCD Ministry.

The Sexual Harassment Bill was the outcome of an Apex court Judgment in 1997 which was in response to a Writ Petition WP No 666-70 of 1992. It is pertinent to note that laws and opinions of courts change very quickly with time and it is almost 20 years since the WP was originally filed. The condition, motivation and numbers of women in the workforce have swelled massively since 1992 and women now get an equal opportunity in almost all areas of employment either through merit or reservation.

What is Public Opinion about Sexual Harassment in 2007

The Sexual harassment act if drafted in the year 1992 might have received major support from the Indian Public to make it a women’s only law and not offer any protection to LGBT i.e. Lesbians/Gays/Bisexual/Transgender and men from sexual harassment. However public opinion changes with time and our society has undergone massive changes since 1992 when the WP was filed. Public opinion in 2007 states the Sexual Harassment at Workplace Law must be Gender Neutral. RTI’s provided a clear insight into the government’s law making process and it has been discovered through RTI’s that during the drafting of the Sexual Harassment at workplace Bill there were innumerable representations from the public seeking to make the bill Gender Neutral. Also there was not a single comment / recommendation received from the public asking for the bill not be made gender neutral. This clearly shows that as of 2007 and the subsequent years the Indian public opinion has shifted and now the Indian citizens want this law to be a gender neutral law. Even Law Commission in its 172nd Report wanted Laws to be made Gender Neutral.

Why has Homosexual and LGBT harassment been completely ignored ?

Homosexual sexual harassment has been documented worldwide and occurs on a large scale in all societies but is never talked about too much. India too has a large number of homosexual couples who lived in the shadows earlier, but now with the Honorable Delhi HC decriminalizing homosexuality there will be a huge increase in male-male and female-female relations in offices too. Sexual harassment at workplace can also happen between two individuals of the same sexual orientation and this bill does not address this in any way. This bill does not have any provisions to protect homosexual men or women from harassment from their same sex partners.

How the WCD Ministry trampled upon overwhelming public Opinion in the SHWB

The below links points us to a PDF that shows the relevant areas of the RTI response received from the WCD, highlighting the file notings during the drafting process of the SHWB. The first column titled “Gist of comment/suggestion” lists the representations received from the Indian public. The second column titled “Number of comments” shows the number of such representations received and the third and final column titled “Response” lists the reply that the WCD ministry has for accepting or rejecting these representations.

From the first and second column it is clear that the WCD ministry had received numerous representations from concerned Indian citizens to make the SHWB law gender neutral but did not heed to any one of them. The ministry instead chose to trample all the representations by the below outrageously sexist, and statements degrading men’s modesty.

Below are the outrageous reasons for the WCD Ministry for not making the bill Gender Neutral
“The overwhelming nature of sexual harassment is sexual harassment of women on account of their female sex. Harassment of men cannot be put on the same footing character wise or incidence wise. Protection of men is also not the mandate of Ministry of WCD”.

The analysis of the statements of the WCD exposes the extremely poor and downright dubious quality of law drafting in India. Let us look at the grossly uneducated statements of the WCD one by one.

1)“The overwhelming nature of sexual harassment is sexual harassment of women on account of their female sex”
This is an unscientific “assumption” that the WCD makes. Laws are not based on assumptions but on hard facts. The WCD Ministry or the Supreme Court does not have any data to back this argument. Credible research all over the world concludes that men too are increasingly falling victims to sexual assault crimes every year. India does not have a procedure of even tracking sexual harassment crimes committed against men. However in the western world which has tracking systems, sexual harassment complaints from men who have harassed by women and other men are rising every year.

US , UK and the European Union have Gender Neutral Sexual harassment laws

The US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission’s (EEOC) data in the below link shows that the percentage of complaints from Men increased from 11.6% in FY 1997 to 16% in FY 2009 showing that men are increasingly being victimized. The total number of sexual harassment cases in 2009 has now increased to 12,700 per year. The percentage of men sexually harassed and their numbers (12700) is simply far too high to be ignored.

http://www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/statistics/enforcement/sexual_harassment.cfm

A 2006 government study in the United Kingdom revealed that 2 out of 5 sexual harassment victims in the UK are male, with 8% percent of all sexual harassment complaints to the Equal Opportunities Commission (Britain’s EEOC), coming from men. The UK’s “Equal Opportunities Commission’s Code of Practice on Sex Discrimination” clearly spells out that protection from sexual harassment protection is available for both men and women. The European Commission’s code of practice on the Protection of the Dignity of Women and Men at Work is used to protect both men and women from sexual harassment at employment.

Given the above data the statement of the WCD ministry does not have any credibility and is at best be termed as a poor and unscientific assumption made to create a Gender Biased law.

2)“Harassment of men cannot be put on the same footing character wise or incidence wise”
The WCD ministry must be called upon to explain the meaning of this sentence and on what basis they concluded that the harassment of men is on a lesser footing than women. Does the WCD consider men any less of human beings than women? Is the stigma and suffering of a man any less than women if sexually harassed at workplace?
This analogy of the WCD Ministry is totally against the Universal Declaration of Human rights adopted by the United Nations. The WCD Ministry has no right or mandate to degrade the modesty of men and claim that the modesty of women is far more valuable than the modesty of men and hence idea to protect men can as well be ignored. The time has come when men and women must be afforded equal protection from all crimes in home, office or otherwise. No one can expect special pamperment based on their gender especially when data overwhelmingly shows that men too are increasingly being victimized by the same crime that women are protected against. This highly biased and sexist statement in itself is evidence enough that the law making process in the sexual harassment act was nothing more but a farce and that ministry has a biased one sided agenda which does not rely on any research on sexual harassment against men, nor does it take into account the sexual harassment laws that have been formulated by other countries.

The Government cannot blatantly ignore one gender and deny offering protection to one gender based on such uneducated and sexist assumptions which are clearly without any merits whatsoever. Hence this sexist assumption of the WCD ministry with which it has rejected the overwhelming majority of public opinion to make the law gender neutral is against the democratic law making process and cannot be accepted.

3) “Protection of men is also not the mandate of Ministry of WCD”

The above remark is an outrageously “stupid” comment and exposes the utterly poor quality of law making in India. The WCD ministry has clearly trying to incite a gender war by these statements. It is common sense that any law must be drafted by a ministry or a committee which has the mandate to protects all the sects, genders, religions or parties who can or might get affected by the law. Will the Hon’ble Prime Minister allow the drafting of a law concerning Hindus and Muslims by a Ministry that openly claims that it does not have the mandate to protect the Muslims? It is obvious that this law will be end being heavily biased against the Muslims. This is exactly what has happened here if we replace the term Hindus with Females and the term Muslim with males. Then on the same lines the Petroleum ministry or coal ministry must be given the open license to pollute the atmosphere and cause oil spills since they do not have the mandate of protection of the environment. The ministry for commerce will issue wholesale licenses for hunting Indian tigers to extinction because the protection of tigers an endangered species is not their mandate! The current law making process is somewhat similar to those during the Nazi period, when Nazis , who had no mandate to protect the Jews, drafted laws for the Jews and then called it a socialist law making to the people of the world.
Every law and action has a cause and an effect. By creating laws and not bothering about aftereffects of the same the WCD has demonstrated a fascist law making attitude.

Relieve WCD and NCW from law drafting responsibilities immediately

It is a very true statement as the mandate of the WCD does not entail protection of men, but using this as shield to create laws only for females while males and homosexuals suffer from the same crimes is beyond my understanding. So I respectfully ask which ministry has the mandate to protect men and the LGBTs. In western societies the law makers while making laws normally make gender neutral laws taking into account detailed research and statistics to first determine if the problem affects both sexes and then they formulate laws that protect both sexes. Laws on Sexual Harassment, Domestic violence and Sexual Assault are some of the laws that are gender neutral in the west.
However in India the situation is starkly different. The main reasons why most new laws are horribly biased and anti male and anti homosexuals simply because the ministry that is making the laws has no mandate to protect men and makes laws with clumsy wording and blatant ignoring of principles of natural justice and universal declaration of human rights. Also there is no watch dog to review these laws and make sure that the issues of the genders other than the female are also appropriately represented. On top of it there are some people in the WCD ministry. These people with vested interest make laws which are both beneficial to their ideology and interests and also make money for their lawyers. The WCD ministry has made it very clear that it does not want to take the responsibility the welfare of men who constitute 50% of the country’s population.

In order to preserve the democracy in India, after learning of the mandate of the WCD from their own mouth organizations like WCD and NCW cannot be allowed to formulate gender laws any more since they will obviously be severely biased. Laws created by these agencies are unnecessarily inciting a gender war in the country and only leading to wide scale family destruction and mutual hatred between genders.

I strongly demand that the WCD ministry and the NCW must not be allowed to formulate or have any say in formulation of laws effective immediately and all law making responsibilities must be immediately handed over to the Ministry of Health & Family Welfare which will have the mandate of protection of males, females, homosexuals and all citizens irrespective of gender and sexual orientation.

By : Arnab Gunguly.

A Women owned a very special goose. Every day the goose would lay a golden egg, which made her very rich.

Because of this goose She was getting enough money whenever she wanted. Her Parents were in rented house but after getting this goose she was living in 2 bedroom house, car and servents.

“Just think,” said NCW a feminists organisation, “If You could have all the golden eggs that are inside the goose, you could be richer much faster.” Why you want to wait for every day to ask money for different reasons

“You’re right,” said her, “We wouldn’t have to wait for the goose to lay her egg every day.”think new reason everyday to ask money from husband, why not have all money in my name Today.

There you are… said NCW, thats why we have tools to cut this goose and get all Golden eggs in one Day.

What are they ? she asked…..

498A so called dowry Law.
Domestic Violence
Divorce
Maintenance
Cusotdy

and we also strongly propose Marital rape and sexual violence.
You can use any of these tools,no one checks you filled Flase or true and there is no punishment for filling false case replied NCW.

So, the she killed the goose and cut it open, and filed false 498A(IPC) on her husband only to find that it was not like every other goose.it was associated with MyNation foundation.

Now she do not get normal eggs either, because of False case,
Police found her FIR to be flase,
Court summoned her for filling false case
Husband proceed with Divorce on Cruelty as there are judgments filling Flase case is cruelty
Now she is running post to pillar.

Moral of the story…..

Aurath ka akkal gutneka niche.

HARTSHILL, England, June 8 — A British woman admitted to inventing a story of a rape to avoid being charged with offenses related to crashing her boyfriend’s car without insurance.

Sarah Hunter, 30, of Hartshill, England, pleaded guilty in Coventry Magistrates Court to wasteful employment of police time, using a vehicle without insurance and failing to stop after an accident, themedia reported Tuesday.

Prosecutors said Hunter took her boyfriend’s car, which she was not insured to drive, without his permission and crashed into two parked cars in Canley. They said she ran to a nearby house and concocted a story of being dragged from the car by two men and raped in an alleyway.

Police said Hunter’s story wasted 15 hours of their time and caused panic in the neighborhood, where residents believed rapists were at large.

Hunter faces up to six months in prison when she is sentenced later this month.

Why Indian women want or Brand them self as handicapped or under privileged….?

No one stop them from Education or Holding a Job or stand for Election as President of India herself a Women.
If anyone is stopping a Girl from attending a School then, it’s her Family, and Family knows what’s good for their Daughter, Government should approach such family if their sons are going to school and Girl child is not, and make law Accordingly.

There Should not be any Reservation based on Gender, that make biased law, Women has equal right to achieve anything with her capacity, If government is making laws only for them then it ignoring men and its injustice in their part.

The Women’s Reservation Bill, which was rather unexpectedly and dramatically passed by the Rajya Sabha in the Budget session, is imbued with at least two liberal values: diversity and gender justice. If, and when, the concept of reserving 33 per cent seats for women in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies becomes a reality, there is much that they could do to rectify the gender asymmetry in existing laws.

For instance, consider the absence of consent as a prerequisite for Hindu marriage. The traditional justification for it is that Hindu marriage is conceptually a sacrament (where consent is irrelevant) rather than a contract (where consent is essential). In our patriarchal society, non-insistence on the consent of the marrying parties places the woman at a disadvantage.

Gender inequity is more glaring in the realm of criminal law. If the wife is above 15 years of age, the law gives the husband the license to rape her. It actually says: “Sexual intercourse by a man with his own wife, the wife not being under fifteen years of age, is not rape.” Indeed, it is absurd that in this day and age we have a provision that implies that within a marriage, sex does not have to be consensual. Most advanced countries recognize marital rape.

Adding insult to injury, the provision relating to adultery makes it clear that only a husband can initiate criminal proceedings. There is no such corresponding right granted to the wife because the Victorian-vintage provision considers her to be the husbands property and she therefore has to suffer in silence if he is indulging in adultery.

The best alternative would be to turn it completely into a civil offence, for which the remedy available is damages, or separation, or divorce. Fortunately, the National Commission for Women, taking cue from liberal democracies, recommended that it was time India too decriminalized adultery.

The law on prostitution shows another glaring asymmetry. It is only female sex workers who are liable under it, never the male clients who are responsible for the existence of that industry. A Bill seeking to redress this anomaly was introduced in the last Lok Sabha. That it could not be passed is indicative of lack of will to correct gender inequities in the existing male-dominated system.

There is nothing male dominated as such, If anyone see today’s society men has no rights at all. Even in Family or Society. Society gives all family responsibility to men only but nothing is reserved for him, but for women Everything is reserved and if women do not take responsibility no one talk Against her.

How many women take responsibility to run a home….? if Man do not bring money everyone blame and curse him and if a women sit at home no one talk about her.

Most of the Indian homes, nothing moves without women node, Man has wife permission to say, he is THE BOSS

If a women run away with her Lover also Indian Law force husband to pay her maintenance, Even she capable and Educated she can sit at home and demand money from husband and Law Force man to pay her.

99% Child Custody goes to women, even she is Prostitute or have Criminal Records.

Women has Equal rights in her Father Property, even Father sold half of the property for her wedding and ornaments so her Brothers gets only 25% (if anything left).

If Indian women deny sex with husband then as per law she has right to deny and husband has no right to force her, that leads to marital rape, even that law is not there women can sue husband with many other existing laws of harassment or domestic violence. If man do the same she has right to get Divorce for not satisfying her or she can Brand him as impotent.

She can file many false cases like Dowry law (498A) domestic violence for that she need no proof, only her one word is enough, Police will dump husband and his whole family behind bars without any investigation and Funny thing is there is punishment for misusing these laws, this shows Law not only support women only but shield misusers too.

It’s totally women World, still they want RE-SERVATION.

This Reservation should be for physically challenged persons but not based on Gender or Religion

Dateline: India
By: Vineeta Pandey
From: We Men Us
Via: The Honour Network

Priority News Exchange Program

In India, one married man commits suicide every nine minutes. Of the total 1,25,017 cases of suicide in 2008, married men alone accounted for 57,639. The overall male-female ratio of suicide victims for the year 2008 was 64:36, according to the latest data of the National Crime Record Bureau (NCRB). The general scene is much grimmer. Suicides in 2008 registered a decadal growth of 19.4% compared to 1998, the figures say. They also reveal a year-on-year rise of 1.9% compared to the 2007 numbers —1,22,637.

The overall increase in cases involving women was 355 in two years while it was 2,187 among men. The increase in suicide among men is six times more than that of women

For More Click: 893-one-married-man-commits-suicide-every-9-min.html

This is a Comparison between India and Guantanamo Bay(GTMO/GITMO).

Reason :

Guantanamo Bay : Terrorism
India : IPC 498A (section 3 of Dowry prohibition Act, 1961.) Section 498A was inserted into the penal code in 1983/4

Area Covered :

Guantanamo Bay : 45 square miles (116 km)
India : 3,287,263 km (1,269,219.3 sq mi)

Accusation :

Guantanamo Bay : Detainees accused of supporting Terrorism and involved in Terrorist Activities.
India : Charged under False Accusation of Dowry Law (498A IPC) and treated as guilty till proven innocent.

Detainees:

Guantanamo Bay : Around 619 (estimated)
India : 79860 Per Year( 2008 NCRB data )

Location :

Guantanamo Bay : Camp Echo and Camp Delta. US Naval Base in South Cuba
India : Every Police Station of India.

Facilities :

Guantanamo Bay : Delta facility allows detainees to consult with lawyers. which have a shower and lavatory, plus four communal living rooms for 10 detainees each. In Camp 4, each detainee has a bed and a locker. Camp 4 detainees may eat their meals together.
India : As soon as FIR filled men are arrested and dumped in crowded locker where there is no place to sit and its stinking with Urine.(no need to tell there is no lavatory) one meal is Provided even it says Vegetarian but you can find fried / boiled worms.(Mostly half boiled) Most of the victims are not allowed to talk to lawyer or relatives till they secure bail bribing officials.

Rights :

Guantanamo Bay : International Organizations and Human rights activist fight for detainees.
India : Victim is Branded as criminals till he prove False case as False and that take not less than 10 years (As per Author experience). Here Men do not have any rights as Indian Judiciary is not treating them as Humans at all.

Victims :

Guantanamo Bay : Accused who involved in Terrorists and they have intelligence report and tracking of most of the Detainees.
India : Any Married Man, his Parents / Relatives / Friends / Children and even breast fed Babies.

Current Status :

Guantanamo Bay : 530 out of 619 of them are released in few Years and Allowed Petition to sue United States of America and President Obama Signed it to Close down this facility within a Year.
India : No sign of Amendment instead Feminists(NCW/WCD) demanding to make it more stringent. As per 2008 NCRB data 79860 Men are arrested (Plus at least 4 of his Family Members) per year. (Count 79860 + 4 each family Members X 26 years) and no report on any damage or defamation awarded for those Falsely accused after clearing their Accusations.

Now you decide which is Better…

Now you know Guantanamo Bay(GTMO/GITMO) is better than India.

Ref :

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Camp_Delta

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Camp_Echo_(Guantanamo)

http://mynation.net/dowryact.htm [ About IPC 498A ]
http://mynation.net/pil/ [ PIL against IPC 498A ]
Study Report on Indian Men
Study Report on IPC 498A
AutoBioGraphy of a Dowry Law Victim [ Guilty till Proven Innocent ]

Shoaib Malik was in news for few days, not because of he is a cricketer or planning to marry Sania Mirza an Indian Sports Star, but because even he is a Pakistani National still he was charged under Indian Penal code 498A. With one word of his so called 1st wife, his passport was impounded and police took him into custody. Even Under TADA / POTA Police will not arrest anyone without investigation and seize Passport of Foreign National, so it’s more powerful than all those criminals cases ?

What is IPC-498a ?

ACCORDING TO Section 498A IPC is

Cognizable – The accused can be arrested and jailed without warrant or investigation
Non-Bailable – The accused must appear in the court to request bail
Non-Compoundable – The complaint cannot be withdrawn by the petitioner

When an FIR (First Information Report) under IPC section 498A (anti-dowry law) is registered by a woman, the accused – the
husband and his old parents, brothers, sisters, relatives – are arrested and jailed without investigation. The Supreme Court of India has ruled several times that arrest should be an exception, and not compulsory.
Why there is no penalty for disobeying the Supreme Court’s orders ?
Is it not mental cruelty to subject a person to arrest without investigation or reasonable cause ?
Police are subjected to gender sensitization training wherein they are forced to take women’s complaint and arrest the accused even when they find the case to be fabricated. And in case the police do not react on a woman’s false complaint, the women groups are given unnecessary powers to take legal action against the officer-in-charge of the police station.

The Dowry Prohibition Act 1961 (Amended in 1984 and 1986) (India)
Dowry violence occurs when husbands and their families subject women to physical and mental abuse if womens payment in lieu of marriage (dowry) is considered to be insufficient.

IPC – 498A. HUSBAND OR RELATIVE OF HUSBAND OF A WOMAN SUBJECTING HER TO CRUELTY: Whoever, being the husband or the relative of the husband of a woman, subjects such woman to cruelty shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to three years and shall also be liable to fine.

Explanation: For the purposes of this section, “cruelty” means
(a) Any willful conduct which is of such a nature as is likely to drive the woman to commit suicide or to cause grave injury or danger to life, limb or health (whether mental or physical) of the woman; or

(b) Harassment of the woman where such harassment is with a view to coercing her or any person related to her to meet any unlawful demand for any property or valuable security or is on account of failure by her or any person related to her to meet such demand.

The Indian Dowry Prohibition Act I961 (amended in 1984 and 1986) prohibits “any property or valuable security given or agreed to be given either directly or indirectly by one party to a marriage to the other at or before or at any time after the marriage in connection with the marriage”. The giver of dowry can be punished with 5 years imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 15,000. Those demanding dowry are punishable by imprisonment from 6 months to 2 years with a fine of Rs. 1,00,000. It seems ironic that giver of the dowry who is ‘forced’ to give the dowry faces a greater punishment whereas the perpetrator of the crime doesn’t. but funny thing is none of the Dowry giver ever charged in the history of Indian Judiciary other than few rupees of expenses.

The Indian Marriage and Divorce Act was amended in 1984 stating that gifts of excessive value given at the time of marriage, are considered to be unlawful dowry. In addition, complainants are allowed to have third parties such as their parents or welfare and womens organizations to file a complaint and initiate legal action.

The accused, on a woman’s one complaint, are considered guilty until proven innocent, and the burden is on the accused to prove their innocence in the courts. It is even more torturous that old ailing parents too are arrested prior to investigation. Is this not violation of Human Rights of Indian citizen?

Section 498 (A) of the Indian Penal Code makes it mandatory for police to book husband and his parents and other relatives/friends whoever being named on the complaint by wife or her close relatives and jail them. There is no penalty (even a fine) for filing a false case.

There are several cases, without investigation initially, police arrest elderly parents, unmarried sisters, pregnant, sisters. Many parents and sisters have committed suicide after spending some 5 to 15 days in jail.

Media reported Shoaib Malik reportedly paid 1 Million dollar to Siddiqui Family (1st wife) and case was dropped without any charges

This is not only one case, only because he is famous cricketer and going to marry Sania Mirza, he was in news; same thing happened to Tamil Actor Prashant, he was also charged with same notorious 498A IPC and after getting money girl side withdraw said case. Indian Judiciary call it out of court settlement.

Even USA state Dept. already issued warning to its citizens at : http://travel.state.gov/travel/india.html
at “DOWRY/VISA DEMANDS” section about travelling to India for marriage, clearly to avoid 498A.

“DOWRY/VISA DEMANDS: A number of U.S. citizen men who have come to India to marry Indian nationals have been arrested and charged with crimes related to dowry extraction. Many of the charges stern from the U.S. citizen’s inability to provide an
immigrant visa for his prospective spouse to travel immediately to the United States. The courts sometimes order the U.S.citizen to pay large sums of money to his spouse in exchange for the dismissal of charges. The courts normally confiscate the American’s passport, and he must remain in India until the case has been settled. There are also cases of U.S. citizen women whose families force them against their will into marriages to Indian nationals.”

We have thousands such cases were men and his family charged with this section and girl side get money / Divorce / maintenance then they withdraw case.

Why do people misuse IPC 498a ?

Legal Extortion – When marriage is on the brink of Divorce, she finds no better weapon to harass her husband and in-law than 498A. Women will blackmail her husband and in-laws and coerce them to fulfill her demands or else she will file a false complaint against them. The husband knows that the law indiscriminately favors the woman and so he agrees to her selfish demands. In Shoaib Malik and Prashant case, after they paid money there was no case or complaint at all. Under Sharia law Shoaib can marry 4 women, so his so called 1st wife will not get money, but this 498A helped her to get money and Divorce within 3 Days. No other Law in the world will give such a speedy relief of anyone.

Pre/extra marital Affairs – She marries to satisfy her parents without disclosing her past. When the husband finds out about her pre marital affairs, she files a false dowry case to blackmail him.

Domination – Wife wants the husband to abandon his parents and siblings, so that she can have total control over his
finances and social behavior, including his life-style.

Custody – Deny the father and his family access to their child(ren).

Fraudulent Marriages – Many times girl’s family will not disclose actual facts of their daughter, at the time of marriage.
Such facts, if known by the groom, the marriage would have never taken place. And when the husband stands his ground, the girl and her family begins their legal extortion.

In-Laws – When modern women are unable to adjust with her in-laws, when they find it difficult to dominate her husband and make him dance on her tunes, she goes for filing a false dowry case.

Todays Modern women very well know, there is no punishment for filling false case, she can withdraw at will Law will not question her for misusing for her gain. Even she can swear in court with tears and Indian Judiciary will beleive in her.
Everyone knows there are loopholes in 498A, and media reports, Judges warn and Politician admit openly.

Still there are no Amendments to this Section

An offence has been committed by the accused upon the sole testimony of the woman alleging abuse. Given that lying in court has never been taken seriously enough to invoke punishment, laws which presume guilt even before the trial has begun are prone to great misuse.

98% misuse is “okay” says Minister Renuka choudhary [ Source : http://www.ibnlive.com/news/ill-empower-women-chowdhury/26051-3-0.html ]

Supreme court of India already shown their concern and asked to Stop the “Legal Terrorism ” in the form of misuse of 498a and the necessary changes to be made by Parliament , but it seems our LAW makers prefers to sleep in silence [Source :
http://www.telegraphindia.com/1050913asp/nationstory_5231379.asp ]

Despite the recommendations of the Supreme Court of India and Justice Malimath Committee that the legislative arm should modify the laws such that the innocent are protected. The suggested amendment in the 498A law has been largely ignored.
Innocent men and old parents are visiting women cell for help, but they are neglected. Unchecked, this social evil is threatening the foundation of the Indian Family system.

We have proofs that it’s a bargain tool to make money, minister admits its 98% misuse and even Supreme court called it Legal Terrorism, still as per recent report women organizations demanding again to make this law more stringent and Renuka Choudhary rightly said, its time for men to suffer.

For : MyNation Foundation
http://mynation.net

London, April 6 At least a third of unfaithful British mothers have had a one-night stand, a new survey has found.

The survey for parenting website Netmums showed that 64 percent cheated on their men before having children, The media reported Tuesday.

After having children, the most common time to play away was when youngsters were under five while the number who cheat comes down as children get older.

“Infidelity is often a symptom of deep issues. Many couples work through the pain and end up happy,” Netmums counsellor Chris Bannigan was quoted as saying.

The survey revealed that a third of the unfaithful mothers had a one-night stand, two-fifths had serious flings while a fifth fell in love.

As many as 37 percent chose an ex-partner, 31 percent slept with a stranger and 12 percent tugged a childhood sweetheart.

The survey also found that fathers were as likely to cheat and it showed 63 percent of relationships in which a partner cheated failed.

India, Always follow British, of their wrong doing only and Indian women are not far behind of British mothers if survey taken, says Experts

Original source : http://supari.org/british-mothers/

Terrorism [ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terrorism ]

Common definitions of terrorism refer only to those violent acts which are intended to create fear (terror), are perpetrated for an ideological goal (as opposed to a lone attack), and deliberately target or disregard the safety of non-combatants (civilians).

Terrorism is defined as political violence in an asymmetrical conflict that is designed to induce terror and psychic fear (sometimes indiscriminate) through the violent victimization and destruction of noncombatant targets (sometimes iconic symbols). Such acts are meant to send a message from an illicit clandestine organization. The purpose of terrorism is to exploit the media in order to achieve maximum attainable publicity as an amplifying force multiplier in order to influence the targeted audience(s) in order to reach short- and midterm political goals and/or desired long-term end states.”

Terrorist attacks are usually carried out in such a way as to maximize the severity and length of the psychological Impact Each act of terrorism is a “performance” devised to have an impact on many large audiences.

Section 498A IPC, the most draconian law ever formed to infringe upon the civil liberties of individuals and rip-apart the family system of India. This one law wreaks so much havoc on Indian men and their families that it drives them to suicide.
Every year close to 58000 husbands commit suicide, every nine minutes a married man ends his life and in the last 12 years 170,000 husbands have ended their life unable to bear the domestic violence and false cases from their wives and in-laws.

Section 498A which mandates arrest of innocent persons merely on one word of complaints without any investigation into the complaint or corroborate it with evidence. Not only that, even the judiciary uses the Section to abuse men. Often when the complaint is received, husband and his family are not given bail.

The Government of India, under the sway of the radical feminists of India(NCW/WCD), has been arresting over 27,000 women/year of
all ages since 2004. In all these cases, these women, including nursing mothers, little girls and grandmothers, were arrested without an investigation into the veracity of the complaints filed. Over 1,30,000 Women Have Been Arrested Under Section 498A Since 2004.

Links to these tables are given below:

• Crime in India 2007
• Crime In India 2006
• Crime In India 2005
• Crime In India 2004

All the Tables are in the following file
.

http://ncrb.nic.in/cii2008/Statistics2008.pdf [ Page 363 ]

Number of Males and Females arrested in IPC Crimes

27,13,971 male ———-1,68,315 female

Number of Males and Females arrested in SLL Crimes

40,96,743 male ———-1,59,245 female

Total Number of Males and Females arrested in Both Crimes

6810714 male ———-327560 female

Grand Total of all People Arrested: 71,38,274

Statistics :

1. 280 children arrested in 2006 under the draconian laws.
2. As per the NCRB data, more than 80% people arrested under dowry
laws cases have turned out to be innocent. (For example : in 2006 a total number of 137180 persons were arrested under 498A and out of those 4812 were not even charge sheet. Out of the 62746 persons who were charge sheeted – 50,895 i.e. approx 81% were found innocent after the completion of the trial and the rest are still under trial).

The Indian police know about the abuse of this law as they are the primary beneficiaries of this extortion racket.

If an arrest is made, the arrested person has to arrange bail to get out of judicial custody. So if 60% of these arrests are unnecessary or unjustified, the number of such arrests comes to be 42,82,964, i.e. around 43 Lakh unjustified arrests.
Assuming a conservative amount of Rs 10,000 / 20,000 needed to pay a lawyer, bribes etc to secure a bail, the total amount ranges from 4,282 Cr to 8565 Cr. isn’t it a illegal bail industry.

Indian Government along National commission for Women (NCW) and their associated are promoting the same even openly in Media/society/Parliament, which even Supreme Court of India also termed as “Legal Terrorism”

Terrorist [ ter•ror•ist ]

1.a person, usually a member of a group, who uses or advocates terrorism.
2.a person who terrorizes or frightens others.[ “It is men’s turn to suffer” – On National television speaking about the Domestic Violence Act. Renuka Chowdhary Former MP, Former Minister of State (Independent Charge) for Ministry of Women and Child Development Ref : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Renuka_Chowdhury ]

This makes Renuka Chowdhary is a TERRORIST and WCD as a Terrorist Organization

Nature of Terrorists :

To avoid detection, a terrorist will look, dress, and behave normally until executing the assigned mission. Some claim that attempts to profile terrorists based on personality, physical, or sociological traits are not useful. The physical and behavioral description of the terrorist could describe almost any normal person.

These Feminists has very good theme “EMPOWER WOMEN” to conceal their terrorists Activities

NCW is openly promoting the Legal Terrorism in this country through multiple duplications of LAW and violating the Indian constitutions article 14/20/21 and refuse to show any concern to protect the constitutional duty to save the lives and property of every citizens of India in the name of empower women

This is Crimes against humanity, as defined by the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court Explanatory Memorandum,”are particularly odious offences in that they constitute a serious attack on human dignity or grave humiliation or a degradation of one or more human beings. They are not isolated or sporadic events, but are part either of a government
policy (although the perpetrators need not identify themselves with this policy) or of a wide practice of atrocities tolerated or condoned by a government or a de facto authority. Murder; extermination; torture; rape and political, racial, gender or religious persecution and other inhumane acts reach the threshold of crimes against humanity only if they are part
of a widespread or systematic practice. Isolated inhumane acts of this nature may constitute grave infringements of human rights, or depending on the circumstances, [ Ref : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crimes_against_humanity ]

Not only this NCW is found to be misusing its Funds, and not solving problem of women which these funds are intended to be,These observations, made by the Controller & Auditor General’s(CAG) inspection report, indicate the malaise that has crept into the NCW. The inspection found that of the 12,895 cases, 7,509 were taken up. Of these, only 1,077 were disposed of.

Perpetrators (Terrorist)

The perpetrators of acts of terrorism can be individuals, groups, or states.
Those who support it financially.[ A state or a International Body can sponsor terrorism by funding or harboring a terrorist organization. Opinions as to which acts of violence by states consist of state-sponsored terrorism vary widely.
When states provide funding for groups considered by some to be terrorist, they rarely acknowledge them as such.]
Those who do not condemn this criminal Act.
Those who give refuge and encourage such Act
Those who spread the word of Terrorism (e.g. : media) Media exposure may be a primary goal of those carrying out terrorism, to expose issues that would otherwise be ignored by the media. Some consider this to be manipulation and exploitation of the media. Others consider terrorism itself to be a symptom of a highly controlled mass media, which does not otherwise give voice to alternative viewpoints, a view expressed by Paul Watson who has stated that controlled media is responsible for terrorism, because “you cannot get your information across any other way”

These Laws are made by Lawyer collective, which is governed by Feminists, funded and supported by NCW/WCD to make / draft laws for them.
NCW/ WCd is the ring leader of all these activities, They Advice Indian Government on these laws and pressurize them to make Bills and Acts. And Indian Government without verifying, Even there are reports of misuse this law Turn blind Eye on such misuse, still they Fund these Feminists Organizations.
UNO is the Another Sponsorer of these Feminists Organization.

all together its Lawyer collective, NCW, WCD, Indian Government and UNO

Why not charge them in International Criminal Court:

International Criminal Court (ICC) was established in The Hague (Netherlands) and the Rome Statute provides for the ICC to have jurisdiction over genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes. The definition of what is a “crime against humanity” for ICC proceedings has significantly broadened from its original legal definition or that used by the UN,[16] and Article 7 of the treaty stated that:

For the purpose of this Statute, “crime against humanity” means any of the following acts when committed as part of a widespread or systematic attack directed against any civilian population, with knowledge of the attack.

(e) Imprisonment or other severe deprivation of physical liberty in violation of fundamental rules of international law;
(f) Torture;
(h) Persecution against any identifiable group or collectivity on political, racial, national, ethnic, cultural, religious, gender as defined in paragraph 3, or other grounds that are universally recognized as impermissible under international law, in connection with any act referred to in this paragraph or any crime within the jurisdiction of the Court;
(k) Other inhumane acts of a similar character intentionally causing great suffering, or serious injury to body or to mental or physical health.

Conclusion : Those who involved in Terrorism activities and crime against humanity should be charged in International Criminal Court. Innocent citizens are Arrested without investigation, Imprisoned, tortured and Prosecuted with Law made my Lawyer collective, NCW, WCD, Indian Government and UNO knowingly support it Financially .

Also Refer :

TRUTH About dowry Law and Its Misuse.

Violence a home truth for India Husband

India’s New “Domestic Violence Act” – A Study Report