• SPONSORS

  • Language support

    We support 44 Languages to Post Articles.
    Albanian, Armenian, Belarusian, Bulgarian, Catalan, Chinese, Croatian, Czech, Danish, Dutch, English, Estonian, Faeroese, Finnish, French, Georgian, German, Greek, Hindi, Hungarian, Icelandic, Indonesian, Italian, Japanese, Kazakh, Latvian, Lithuanian, Malay, Mongolian Cyrillic, Nepali, Norwegian, Polish, Portuguese, Romanian, Russian, Slovak, Slovenian, Swedish, Syriac, Thai, Turkish, Ukrainian, Uzbek, and Vietnamese.

    Be a Author --Register and let us know here

    Register HERE


    AFFILIATE
    Honor Network
  • RSS ARTICLES

  • Top Commentator

  • WORLD

  • EUROPE

  • INDIA

  • MIDDLE East & AFRICA

  • RSS AutoBiography of a Dowry Law ( IPC 498A ) Victim

  • RSS Blog reactions to http://mynation.net/voice/

  • Archives

  • « IPC 498A Explained | Home | The consequences of filing a FALSE DOWRY CASE »

    India: Safe Haven for International Child Abduction

    By Crusader | March 27, 2008

    For several reasons, India has become a safe haven for child abductors.

    First, India is not a party to the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction. The Convention is the fundamental international treaty that protects the rights of abducted children and serves to have them returned promptly to the country of their habitual residence.

    Second, the court system in India is extremely slow so that an abductor has ample time to create “facts on the ground” in terms of getting the child sufficiently settled into life in India as to justify an Indian court in ultimately deeming that it is best to keep the child in India.

    Third, the law in India was previously settled that foreign children taken by a parent to India without the consent of the other parent would normally be returned to their country of residence or nationality. However recent decisions of courts in India have changed that rule and have held that foreign custody orders are merely items to consider as part of an overall custody review. Thus in a decision dated March 3, 2006 the Bombay High Court at Goa refused to issue a writ of habeas corpus on behalf of a British mother from Ireland whose eight-year-old daughter had allegedly been abducted to Goa by the child’s American father. The High Court dismissed the mother’s application on the ground that normal custody hearings should be undertaken and completed in Goa.

    Fourth, no Indian legislation sets forth helpful law on this issue.

    As a consequence, courts outside India should be extremely wary about allowing parents to take children for temporary visits to India over the objections of the other parents since there is a great likelihood that parents who wrongfully retain children in India will get away with their wrongful conduct scot-free in India.

    PLEASE SIGN EQUAL CUSTODY RIGHTS PETITION HERE

    http://mynation.net/custody/

    Popularity: 22% [?]

    If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

    Topics: INDIA |

    Comments


    eXTReMe Tracker