Below are two news items from down under of two mothers who kidnapped their kids and the media simply ignored both news stories. The question is how often does the MSM do this with other stories, who authorizes this ignoring of momâ€™s kidnapping, and then sensationalizes when dads do this only? Then Iâ€™d like to know how these executives can sleep at night too. This is perfect proof of why HN puts such news out, for the MSM covers the other side in full and who will cover the other half if not the MRA news services. We bring balance by covering the other half of the news- The Honor Network
FAMILY LAW – CHILDREN – With whom a child shall live – Magellan – Children recovered after removal interstate by mother – Interum – Parenting orders – Further family report
30 March 2007
3. The evidence before the court (referred to in an earlier judgement) is that when the father arrived to collect S that weekend, he (S) was not at the police station which was the agreed collection point. Subsequently, the independant children’s lawyer learnt that the mother had left her home, having emptied it of belongings, and disappeared around midnight on the Friday evening, taking S and H with her. Police, and then the fire brigade, were involved, breaking into the home and making enquiries of neighbors and schools. Subsequently, this court made orders for the recovery of both children and, in due course, for the publication of information about them. The mother and two children were eventually discovered in South Australia, and recovered; interum orders provided that on their recovery both children spend time with the father. That in a very brief compass, is the background to this matter.
Does anybody remember the media hype about this mum kidnapping her kids
It was January/February this year, where were all the flashing lights and roadside alerts, the kids faces on the front page of every newspaper,
oh hang on a second, It wasnâ€™t the dad kidnapping them…. no wonder…..-Ross Mitchell
Originally posted 2007-11-15 17:19:38.