AutoBiography of a Dowry Law Victim

My Struggle with Legal Terrorism

Blind eye from SCLSC – Letter to Supreme Court Legal Services Committee

Months back i wrote a letter to Supreme Court Legal Services Committee(SCLSC), not to help in my case, just to inform them and as per rules, it says “For seeking legal advice, the Act does not prescribe any eligibility criteria.“. and as usual there was no response from them.

Their website is: http://sclsc.nic.in and Email is : sclsc @ nic.in

Here is the letter i posted.

< — LETTER — >

Dear Sir/ Madam

My Name is xxxxxx yyyyyy; I am writting it you to seek advice, as SLSA says For seeking legal advice, the Act does not prescribe any eligibility criteria.

In the matter bearing No. Regular Cr. CC No. 317 of 2000 (under Dowry Prohibition Act / IPC 498A) pending before the Honourable Court of Jt. Civil Judge JD & JMFC Vasai, Thane Dt. Maharashtra since 2000.

For last 12 years Complainant never been to court for single date, if she was really harassed for Dowry, why she is not coming to court to demand justice. As i never demanded or took any Dowry. Even Police Charge sheeted on same day of FIR without any investigation.

PLEASE VARIFY MY CLAIM OF HER ABSENSE FROM ABOVE SAID COURT FOR YOUR RECORD.

for last 12 years i am getting dates after dates, even Approched HC Bombay, because of one day Absense of Lawyer, HC dismissed petiton.

i wrote hundreds of letters

With Reference of:
President of India letter DPAR 156 LMX 2004 dated 23/2/2004,[Total 5 Letters received so far]
Maharashtra State Legal Services Authority, letter MSLSA/Aid/23/2004/1115
Karnataka State Legal Services Authority, letter 13 PS 2004 dated 11/06/2004
Thane legal service committee letter: 422 of 2005;
Vasai legal service committee letter 206/05 dated 27/01/05;
Karnataka State Legal Services Authority, letter 13 PS 2006 dated 22/01/2007
Vidhi Va nyaya Vibhag kramank sankirna 2006/2255(329) dated 06/02/07
Vasai legal service committee letter 18/07 dated 16/02/07
Vasai legal service committee letter 46/07 dated 16/04/07 and many more……

Lawyers says none will work, as Judge take his own Time.

I changed 3 lawyers so far, they are just interested in dragging case along with Judge without any relief.

PLEASE GUIDE ME WHAT TO DO NEXT.
AND WHO IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DELAY AND HARASSMENT.

< — END OF LETTER — >

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link

MyNation Times Magzine


All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Important SC/HC Judgements on 498A IPC
LandMark Judgments

STUDY REPORTS

FREE LEGAL ADVICE
REGISTER
FORGOT PASSWORD
CHANGE PASSWORD GROUP RULES
Your Valuables Comments are always Welcome; Please click on the Link No Comments OR Comments on Every Post; If you enjoyed Reading My Struggle;
Thank You For your Time.
Browse http://mynation.net/abio/sitemap/ for List of all Posts

Contact Site Admin

RSS Biography in Hindi

  • An error has occurred, which probably means the feed is down. Try again later.
Copyright © 2024 AutoBiography of a Dowry Law Victim
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Section 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation