Welcome › Forums › Advice › Maintenance › maintenance › Reply To: maintenance
what is your advice to this SPECIFIC case of Ms. Gulati, assuming what she is say is true? and father/husband neglected/abandoned the child/wife.
I do not believe it to be true. Period. Hence, I do not want to encourage such false cases.
you are wrong with raise in population employment problem has still aggreviated and not only divorced woman but also young unmarried people find it difficult to get job. not all the company have woman favouring hr policy.
litracy rate has increase and also competition.
Population problem may have aggravated but same time the opportunities are much more than earlier times. And, all companies are having pro-women HR policies because it is politically, socially and legally correct to do so. It is easier for women to get jobs than for men to get it. P
do you consider man fool and woman too intelligent to trap man and have childrens to extort money? is it not concious decision of husband and wife to have a child?
Men are fools to be living in the medieval era of the15th century protecting and providing women while women have moved onto the 25th century. Most men still think that after marriage they want to have a child and they think its a social obligation of continuation of the family [a medieval mindset]. Until men wake up and move on to the 25th century, these problems will continue. This issue is also about confusion between traditional values and modern values. This confusion is being made best use of by the women to get what they want.
Institution of marriage has lost its significance in modern times.
this is the only thing I agree with you. I think the feminism is a major contributor to this loss of significance because one of the main objectives of feminism is to destroy the family system as it is being looked upon as an oppression of women.
laws have been formed based of prevailing situation in our country and to maintenance of law and order. time and again it is amended accordingly. criminal punished will not favour law which say he should be punished. there will criticism and favourism.
Laws are formed by corrupt lawmakers keeping in mind their vote-banks and the amount of moolah they can get by using the people and system under them to extort. Laws are made for the common man alone with the intention of harassment. Justifications given are all excuses for their shady deals.
if you say this is not a prevailing situation (majority) then prove it?
The proof is already there. Lawmakers are corrupt and they have huge money involved and laws are made to extort in the name and garb of helping some people. Vote-bank politics is also a very big factor in making laws. You want me to prove these?
