- This topic has 2 replies, 1 voice, and was last updated 13 years, 8 months ago by .
- Posts
filed february 2009
this order was passed september 2009
……..this order shall dispose off the contention of ld adv. for the respondent that the present application filed by the applicant mrs XYZ is not maintainable, as there is neither a report from the protection officer, nor from the service provider to the magistrate in terms of provision to section 12 of the section of the Act in question and there has been absolutely not even an iota of incidence resulting into domestic violence in order to attract the provisions of act in question. He further submitted that each and every averment made in the complaint dated 29/1/2009 is denied being false so because the allegations are in respect of incidents……….
………….on the other hand it is the case of the complainant that at this prima facie case the court should not adopt a hyper technical approach, as the protection officer as not filed report to the magistrate as required under DV act, on the contrary the court has to find out what was the case of the petitioner and what relief she was seeking against her seperated husband and therefore the contention raised by the respondent has to rejected and matter has to proceed further…………
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
