Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side)
Kamalika Bakshi (Mukherjee)
vs
Unknown on 8 January, 2018
104 08.01.2018
rkd Ct. No.28
C.R.M. 114 of 2018
(Allowed)
In Re: – An focus for anticipatory bail underneath Section 438 of a Code of Criminal Procedure filed on 04/01/2018 in tie with Uttarpara P.S. Case No. 903 of 2017 antiquated 30/10/2017 underneath Sections 498A/306/304B/34 of a Indian Penal Code.
And In a matter of: Kamalika Bakshi (Mukherjee) ….petitioner.
Mr. Sandipan Ganguly, Sr. Adv., Mr. A. Ghatak, Adv., Md. A. Ansari, Adv., Mr. Y. Deora, Adv.…for a petitioner.
Mr. S. Banerjee, Adv., Ms. P. Ghosh, Adv.…for a State.
It is submitted on interest of a postulant that postulant is a married sister-in-law of a plant housewife and it is submitted that a postulant stands on a same balance as a co-accused person, namely Krishnendu Bakshi has been lengthened on bail.
Learned warn for a State opposes a request for anticipatory bail.
Having deliberate a materials in a box diary and temperament in mind a fact that postulant is a married sister-in- law and a fact that a co-accused person, namely Krishnendu Bakshi has been lengthened on bail, we are prone in extenuation anticipatory bail to a petitioner.
In a eventuality of arrest, a postulant shall be expelled on bail on furnishing a Bond of Rs. 10,000/- with dual sureties of like volume any to a compensation of a Arresting Officer and also theme to a conditions as laid down underneath Section 438(2) of a Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
The focus for anticipatory bail is, thus, likely of.
(Rajarshi Bharadwaj, J.)
(Joymalya Bagchi,J.)
