MyNation KnowledgeBase

Landmark Judgments and Articles on Law

Register to Download

Anticipatory bail postulated to SIL underneath Sections 498A/306/304B/34 of a Indian Penal Code.

Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side)

Kamalika Bakshi (Mukherjee)
Unknown on 8 January, 2018

104 08.01.2018

rkd Ct. No.28

C.R.M. 114 of 2018


In Re: – An focus for anticipatory bail underneath Section 438 of a Code of Criminal Procedure filed on 04/01/2018 in tie with Uttarpara P.S. Case No. 903 of 2017 antiquated 30/10/2017 underneath Sections 498A/306/304B/34 of a Indian Penal Code.

And In a matter of: Kamalika Bakshi (Mukherjee) ….petitioner.

Mr. Sandipan Ganguly, Sr. Adv., Mr. A. Ghatak, Adv., Md. A. Ansari, Adv., Mr. Y. Deora, Adv.…for a petitioner.

Mr. S. Banerjee, Adv., Ms. P. Ghosh, Adv.…for a State.

It is submitted on interest of a postulant that postulant is a married sister-in-law of a plant housewife and it is submitted that a postulant stands on a same balance as a co-accused person, namely Krishnendu Bakshi has been lengthened on bail.

Learned warn for a State opposes a request for anticipatory bail.

Having deliberate a materials in a box diary and temperament in mind a fact that postulant is a married sister-in- law and a fact that a co-accused person, namely Krishnendu Bakshi has been lengthened on bail, we are prone in extenuation anticipatory bail to a petitioner.

In a eventuality of arrest, a postulant shall be expelled on bail on furnishing a Bond of Rs. 10,000/- with dual sureties of like volume any to a compensation of a Arresting Officer and also theme to a conditions as laid down underneath Section 438(2) of a Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

The focus for anticipatory bail is, thus, likely of.

(Rajarshi Bharadwaj, J.)

(Joymalya Bagchi,J.)

See also  Whether Last seen evidence is admissible if it has not attained status of proof?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

CopyRight @ MyNation

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, though No Lawyer will give we Advice like We do

Please review Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You determine afterwards Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We hoop Women Centric inequitable laws like False Section 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

See also  Whether Court can refuse to set aside Exparte decree considering previous conduct of defendant?
MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation