MyNation KnowledgeBase

Landmark Judgments and Articles on Law

Register to Download

Video conferencing allowed instead Transferring Divorce Petition

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION

TRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL) NO.1389 OF 2017

T. RAJALAXMI PETITIONER(S)

VERSUS

G. MANIKANDA PRABHU RESPONDENT(S)

O R D E R
In view of the order of this Court dated 9th March, 2017 in T.P.(C)No.1912 of 2014, titled “Krishna Vani Nagam vs. Harish Nagam” no order of transfer is called for. However, it is open to the petitioner to avail the video conferencing facility in terms of the above mentioned order.

The Transfer Petition is disposed of in above terms.

[J. CHELAMESWAR]
[PRAFULLA C. PANT]

[S. ABDUL NAZEER] NEW DELHI Signature Not Verified DATED;
AUGUST 28, 2017
Digitally signed by DEEPAK MANSUKHANI
Date: 2017.08.29 10:47:10 IST
Reason: SIGNER CARD OF MR. DEEPAK MANSUKHANI IS BEING USED BY MR. OM PARKASH SHARMA
ITEM NO.21 COURT NO.2 SECTION XVI -A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Transfer Petition(s)(Civil) No(s). 1389/2017
T. RAJALAXMI Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
G. MANIKANDA PRABHU Respondent(s)

(FOR ADMISSION and IA No.76319/2017-EX-PARTE STAY)
Date : 28-08-2017 This petition was called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWAR
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAFULLA C. PANT
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S. ABDUL NAZEER
For Petitioner(s) Ms. Aishwarya Bhati, AOR Mr. Jaideep Singh,Adv. Mr. T. Gopal,Adv.
Mr. S. Saravana Kumar,Adv. Ms. Ritu Apurva,Adv.
Mr. Shailendra Sharma,Adv.For Respondent(s)

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following

O R D E R

In view of the order of this Court dated 9th March, 2017 in T.P.(C)No.1912 of 2014, titled “Krishna Vani Nagam vs. Harish Nagam” no order of transfer is called for. However, it is open to the petitioner to avail the video conferencing facility in terms of the above mentioned order. The Transfer Petition is disposed of in above terms. Pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of.

READ  SC Waives Cooling-Off Period - Allows Married Couple To Part As Friends.

(OM PARKASH SHARMA) (RAJINDER KAUR)
AR CUM PS BRANCH OFFICER

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link

All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Important SC/HC Judgements on 498A IPC
Rules and Regulations of India.

STUDY REPORTS

Copyright © 2019 MyNation KnowledgeBase
eXTReMe Tracker
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

READ  Video conferencing And Indian Evidence Act, 1872
Web Design BangladeshWeb Design BangladeshMymensingh