MyNation KnowledgeBase

Landmark Judgments and Articles on Law

THE RIGHT TO SILENCE

LAW COMMISSION OF INDIA ONE HUNDRED EIGHTIETH REPORT   ON   ARTICLE 20(3) OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA AND THE RIGHT TO SILENCE   MAY 2002   May 9, 2002   No:6(3) (76) /2002 –LC (LS) Dear Shri Arun Jaitley ji, I am sending herewith…

Quashing of the 498A FIR

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 249 OF 2004 Shakson Belthissor …. Appellant Versus State of Kerala & Anr. …. Respondents JUDGMENT Dr. Mukundakam Sharma, J. 1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 28.10.2002 passed…

498A, 302 and Burdon of Proof

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIACRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1502 OF 2007 Narendra V/s State of Karnataka JUDGMENT By Dr. ARIJIT PASAYAT, J. 1. Challenge in this appeal is to the judgment of a Division Bench of the Karnataka High Court setting aside…

Accused presence is not compulsory Always

Bombay High Court Bhaskar Sen vs State Of Maharashtra And Ors. on 1 September, 2004 Bench: D Bhosale JUDGMENT D.B. Bhosale, J. 1. This group of five petitions involves a common question of law and, therefore, were heard together and are being disposed of by…

Section 160 Cr.P.C. is not applicable to an accused

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Crl. M.A. No.13547/2010 in W.P. (Crl.) No.847/2010 NEELAM SIBAL ….. Petitioner Through: Ms.Manisha Bhandari and Mr.Omkar Shrivastava, Advs. versus STATE ….. Respondent Through: Ms. P.Mallikarjune, Adv. for Mr.Saleem Ahmed, ASC for State. CORAM:HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV…

Witnesses not Accused answerable to Police

Supreme Court of India State Rep. By Inspector Of Police vs N.M.T. Joy Immaculate on 5 May, 2004 CASE NO.:Appeal (crl.) 575-576 of 2004 PETITIONER:State Rep. by Inspector of Police & Ors. RESPONDENT:N.M.T. Joy Immaculate DATE OF JUDGMENT: 05/05/2004 BENCH:Dr. AR. Lakshmanan. JUDGMENT:J U D…

Use contempt power very sparingly – APEX Court

Bombay High Court D.D. Samudra, Judge, Court Of Small Causes Judge, Mumbai vs Vaziralli Pvt. Ltd. And Vishwesh on 4 April, 2006 Bench: V Palshikar, V Kingaonkar JUDGMENT 1. This is a reference made by the Small Causes Judge, Mumbai, (Shri D. D. Samudra) for…

Judges Assets and RTI

HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on: 13th November, 2009 Judgment pronounced on: 12th January, 2010 LPA No.501/2009 Secretary General, Supreme Court of India ….. Appellant Through: Mr.G.E. Vahanvati, Attorney General for India with Mr.Atul Nanda and Mr.Sanjay Bhardwaj, Advocates Versus Subhash…

Joint family property and MITAKSHARA CO-PARCENARY

Supreme Court of India Appeal (civil) 3040 of 2008 PETITIONER:Hardeo Rai RESPONDENT:Sakuntala Devi and others DATE OF JUDGMENT: 29/04/2008 BENCH:S.B. SINHA & V.S. SIRPURKAR JUDGMENT:J U D G M E N T REPORTABLE CIVIL APPEAL NO. _3040 OF 2008 (Arising out of SLP (C) No….

Condonation of delay in Payment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 5950/2008 and CM Nos. 11380-81/2008 DATE OF DECISION: 18.08.2008 ARVIND KUMAR BHASIN ….. Petitioner Through Mr. Baldev Singh and Mr. Mir Akhtar Hussain, Advs. versus D.D.A. ….. Respondent Through Mr. Gaurav Sarin, Adv. VIPIN SANGHI,…


Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link

All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Important SC/HC Judgements on 498A IPC
Rules and Regulations of India.

STUDY REPORTS

Copyright © 2019 MyNation KnowledgeBase
eXTReMe Tracker
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

Web Design BangladeshWeb Design BangladeshMymensingh