MyNation KnowledgeBase

Landmark Judgments and Articles on Law

SC quash 498a where HC upheld without checking its discrepancies

Supreme Court of India CASE NO.:Appeal (crl.) 1375 of 1999 PETITIONER:V.N. Ratheesh RESPONDENT:State of Kerala DATE OF JUDGMENT: 06/07/2006 BENCH: ARIJIT PASAYAT, LOKESHWAR SINGH PANTA JUDGMENT: J U D G M E N T ARIJIT PASAYAT, J. Appellant calls in question legality of the judgment…

Whether demand of property in connection with marriage amounts to dowry demand?

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Criminal Appeal No. 831 of 2006 Decided On: 08.02.2011 Bachni Devi Vs. State of Haryana through Secretary, Hon’ble Judges/Coram: Aftab Alam and R.M. Lodha, JJ. 1. The mother (A-1) and son (A-2) are in appeal as both of them…

Interrogatories propounded on the Petitioner by the Respondent u/s 125

IN THE COURT OF MS. 0000000000, DISTT.JUDGE, FAMILY COURT 00000000 Case No:000 0000000l Vs. 0000000000l Petition U/s 125 of CrPC for grant of maintenance Code of Civil Procedure – Appendix C – Form No. 2 Interrogatories (Order 11, rule 4) Interrogatories propounded on the Petitioner…

Kerala High Court : Divorce direct on a drift of desertion

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.HARILAL THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SHIRCY V. FRIDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF APRIL 2018 / 23RD CHAITHRA, 1940 Mat.Appeal.No. 260 of 2006 AGAINST THE ORDER IN OP 895/2003 of FAMILY COURT,ERNAKULAM DATED 26-03-2005…

SC : Person not possession of device not compulsory to give certificate as per 65(b) of justification act

CLICK HERE FOR JUDGMENT http://mynation.net/docs/2302-2017

SC : Material on record do not divulge elect of corruption purported 498A quashed

CLICK HERE FOR JUDGMENT http://mynation.net/docs/1565-2017

Cruelty will not always attract 498A – Acquitted

IN THE COURT OF SH. BHARAT PARASHAR, ASJ:FTC:ROHINI:DELHI SC No.: 29/06 STATE VERSUS : (1) VISHESH CHAUDHARY, S/O SH. BHARAT BHUSHAN, R/O QU-85C, PITAM PURA, DELHI. (2) AMIT, S/O SH. BHARAT BHUSHAN, R/O QU-85C, PITAM PURA, DELHI. (3) PARICHEY, S/O SH. BHARAT BHUSHAN, R/O QU-85C,…

Benefit of doubt, Acquittal in 498a IPC

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1340 OF 2013 Manoharan & Anr. ….Appellants Versus State Rep. by Inspector of Police …. Respondent JUDGMENT Uday Umesh Lalit, J. 1. In this interest by special leave, appellants (original indicted Nos.2 and doubt…

SC : Without giving convincing and reasoning reasons check should not be condoned

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 4266-4267 OF 2018 ATCOM TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED …..APPELLANT(S) VERSUS Y.A. CHUNAWALA AND CO. & ORS. …..RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT A.K. SIKRI, J. The benefaction seductiveness is filed impugning a final visualisation and sequence antiquated Nov 21,…

CopyRight @ MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, though No Lawyer will give we Advice like We do

Please review Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You determine afterwards Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We hoop Women Centric inequitable laws like False Section 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation