MyNation KnowledgeBase

Landmark Judgments and Articles on Law

Register to Download

Child should get Fathers Love too

ITEM NO.49                               COURT NO.14                  SECTION XI

                                  S U P R E M E C O U R T  O F        I N D I A
                                          RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

     Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).6303/2017

     (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 25-10-2016 in FA No.416/2016 passed by the High Court Of Judicature At Allahabad)

     ANUJ CHATURVEDI                                                       Petitioner(s)

                                                     VERSUS

     JYOTI                                                                 Respondent(s)

     (IA    No.25007/2018    -                    PERMISSION    TO       FILE    ADDITIONAL  DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES)

     Date : 04-10-2019 This matter was called on for hearing today.

     CORAM :
                             HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA
                             HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT

     For Petitioner(s)
                                       Mr.   M.M. Singh, Adv.
                                       Mr.   Jitendra Kr., Adv.
                                       Mr.   Prashant Kr. Singh, Adv.
                                       Mr.   Rameshwar Prasad Goyal, AOR

     For Respondent(s)
                                       Mr.   Ashok K. Singh, Adv.
                                       Ms.   Sonakshi Monga, Adv.
                                       Mr.   Sandeep K. Bhardwaj, Adv.
                                       Mr.   Ali Safeer Farooqi, Adv.
                                       Mr.   Syed Imtiyaz Ali, Adv.
                                       Mr.   Arvind Kumar Kanva, Adv.
                                       Ms.   Ankita Balooni, Adv.
                                       Mr.   Tanishq Mehta, Adv.
                                       Mr.   Aftab Ali Khan, AOR

                             UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
                                                 O R D E R

We are not inclined to interfere in the order granting custody of the child to the mother. The special leave petition is dismissed Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by ARJUN BISHT Date: 2019.10.05 accordingly.

09:52:39 IST Reason:

However, we give liberty to the petitioner to approach the  Family Court for enhancement of his visitation rights and we direct the Family Court to ensure that visitation rights are fixed in such a manner that the child gets to know and love his father. A child has a right to the affection of both his parents and the Family Court shall ensure that visitation rights are granted in such a manner. The Family Court may also make suitable arrangements for visitation/interim custody during vacation periods. Obviously the Family Court has to keep the interest of the child at the foremost. Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of.

(ARJUN BISHT)                                  (RENU KAPOOR)
COURT MASTER (SH)                              BRANCH OFFICER
READ  Girl Child Custody to Father

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link

All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Important SC/HC Judgements on 498A IPC
Rules and Regulations of India.

STUDY REPORTS

Copyright © 2020 MyNation KnowledgeBase
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Section 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

READ  Whether court should decide issue of custody/visitation rights of minor children on basis of consent of parties?
MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation