MyNation KnowledgeBase

Landmark Judgments and Articles on Law

Register to Download

Double jeopardy in Alimony order – Husband petition allowed

Calcutta High Court
(Appellete Side)

on 16 August, 2018

(SKB) C.O. 2718 of 2018

Shuvro Deb
Smt. Reetuparna Basu Nee Deb @ Oee @ Oindrila & Anr.

Mr. Partha Pratim Roy … for the petitioner.

The grievance of the petitioner/husband is that the trial court acted without jurisdiction in granting, along with alimony, litigation costs at the rate of Rs.5000/- per month over and above a lumpsum amount of Rs.50,000/-.

It appears from the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner that the approach of the petitioner’s husband is extremely fair and the husband is willing to pay the alimony and one-time litigation cost of Rs.50,000/- to the wife but only complains against the double jeopardy caused by litigation costs being directed to be paid two-fold.

It is also alleged by the petitioner that alimony was erroneously granted from the date of application in the absence of any allegation as to the husband being guilty of non-payment of maintenance to the wife in the interregnum. Although there is not much substance in the second contention of the petitioner, there is justification in the grievance that litigation costs should not be directed to be paid two-fold by the petitioner.

Accordingly, the petitioner will serve a copy of C.O. 2718 of 2018 on the opposite party no.1 indicating that the matter will appear as the Contested Application in the monthly list of September, 2018. Service on opposite party no.2 is dispensed with. The petitioner will file affidavit of service on the next date of hearing.

See also  Disclosure of Rape victim’s identity is inconsistent in terms of Section 228-A IPC

There will be an order of stay of operation of the portion of the impugned order whereby the petitioner was directed to pay Rs.5000/- per month as litigation cost, till disposal of the revisional application. It is made clear that there will not be any stay regarding the rest of the impugned order relating to payment of alimony, both current and arrears, as well as the litigation costs of Rs.50,000/-.

(Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya, J.)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link
MyNation Times Magzine

All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Important SC/HC Judgements on 498A IPC
Rules and Regulations of India.


CopyRight @ MyNation

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Section 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

See also  Asking money to start business is not Dowry Demand
MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation