MyNation KnowledgeBase

Landmark Judgments and Articles on Law

Register to Download

Anticipatory bail should not be denied – 498A is not to get Stridhan


Date of decision: 11th September, 2015

BAIL APPLN. 501/2015


Through Mr. S.P.Sharma, Advocate along with a postulant in person.


STATE….. Respondent
Through Mr.Manjeet Singh Oberoi, APP.

SI Hira Lal, P.S.Moti Nagar.

Mr.A.K.Bhardwaj, warn for a complainant along with a complainant in person.


1. The benefaction is an focus underneath Section 438 of a Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for extend of anticipatory bail in F.I.R.No.1045/2014 underneath Section 498A/406/34 IPC purebred during Police Station Moti Nagar, Delhi.

2. The box of a charge is that a complainant/wife lodged a censure antiquated 21st October, 2014, opposite a applicant/husband before a Crime Against Women Cell, Kirti Nagar, New Delhi, alleging therein that she was being tormented by her applicant/husband for dowry and that her stridhan had been wasted by a applicant/husband.

3. Despite steady attempts a discord/dispute between a applicant/husband and a complainant/wife, could not be settled. The theme F.I.R. came to be purebred on 21st October, 2014.

4. The applicant/husband who is benefaction in Court states that he is peaceful to give a sum of Rs.5,00,000/-(Rupees Five Lakh) to his complainant/wife, so that a latter can deposit that income to habituate to a advantage of their teenager child, namely, Naman. Learned warn appearing on interest of a applicant/husband submits that a applicant/husband proposes to do so within a duration of dual months.

5. The pronounced offer done on interest of a applicant/husband is supposed as an endeavour by this Court.

6. A sum of Rs.5,00,000/-(Rupees Five Lakh) in foster of a complainant/wife by approach of a Demand Draft be handed over to schooled warn appearing on interest of a complainant/wife, so as to capacitate a complainant/wife to deposit a same as a Fixed Deposit in a nationalised Bank within a duration of dual months.


7. In perspective of a aforesaid, a usually belligerent on that a applicant’s request for extend of anticipatory bail is against is that a stridhan belonging to a complainant/wife is still in his possession.

8. There is no gainsaying a fact that a record underneath Section 498A/406 IPC are not meant for a liberation of trinket and dowry articles. The applicant/husband can't be denied bail usually on a belligerent that his recover would describe a liberation of trinket and other dowry articles difficult. The complainant/wife can, if she so chooses, pierce a Civil Court for liberation of articles. Ref: ( Jagdish Thakkar vs. State of Delhi, reported as 1993 JCC

117) and (Deepak Kumar and Anr. vs. State, reported as 2008 (3) Crimes 447 (Del.)
9. In perspective of a foregoing, a benefaction bail focus is allowed. In a eventuality of his detain a applicant/husband would be expelled on bail theme to his furnishing a personal bond in a sum of Rs.20,000/-(Rupees Twenty Thousand) with one internal collateral in a like volume to a compensation of a Arresting Officer/Station House In-charge/Officer of a endangered Police Station; theme to a serve condition that he shall approve with a directions given by this Court in courtesy to a endeavour given by him in his Court. He shall co-operate with a review and make himself accessible for doubt as and when called on by a endangered Police Officer.

10. The Bail Application is likely of accordingly.

11. Dasti.

SEPTEMBER 11, 2015

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link
MyNation Times Magzine

All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Important SC/HC Judgements on 498A IPC
Rules and Regulations of India.


CopyRight @ MyNation

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, though No Lawyer will give we Advice like We do

Please review Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You determine afterwards Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We hoop Women Centric inequitable laws like False Section 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

See also  Section 498A I.P.C quashed with Section 482 Cr.P.C
MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation