MyNation KnowledgeBase

Landmark Judgments and Articles on Law

Register to Download

Whether Registrar of Marriage can refuse to register Marriage if it is in Violation Of Minimum Age Limit Under Hindu Marriage Act?


CWP-5135-2020 (O&M)
Date of decision : 15.6.2020

Deepak Kumar


State of Haryana


This writ petition has been filed with a prayer for directions to respondents No.3 and 4 to register their marriage. The petitioners got married on 20.11.2015. The marriage was arranged by their respective families. Meanwhile, two children have been born out of the wedlock. On 18.11.2019, an application for registration of their marriage was filed, but their marriage has still not been registered till date.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioner No.1, namely, Deepak Kumar, was less than 21 years of age on the date of the marriage and thus, there was a violation of Section 5 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. However, in view of Sections 11 and 12 of the said Act, the marriage was only voidable. Neither of the parties has sought to avoid their marriage and thus, there is no legal bar in registration of the same. The case is, in fact, covered by Baljit Kaur Boprai Vs. State of Punjab and another, 2008 (3) RCR (Civil) 109 as well as Jyoti and another Vs. State of Haryana and others, 2019 (4) RCR (Civil) 577.

Learned State counsel is not in a position to controvert the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners. The matter has been adjourned from time to time to enable the learned State counsel to get appropriate instructions. Today also, he has sought time, but I do not find any valid reason to accept the request. A perusal of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, shows that in case, a marriage has been solemnized in violation of the age restriction laid down therein, the marriage is only voidable. However, neither of the parties have sought annulment of the marriage. In fact, the parties are seeking to register their marriage. In law, the marriage is legal and there is no bar to its registration. This case is squarely covered by Baljit Kaur Boparai’s and Jyoti’s cases (supra).

See also  SC: Right to Default Bail, Even if charge sheet seeking extension of time is subsequently filed

The writ petition is accordingly, allowed and respondents No.2 to 4 are directed to ensure that the marriage be registered within two weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link
MyNation Times Magzine

All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Important SC/HC Judgements on 498A IPC
Rules and Regulations of India.


CopyRight @ MyNation

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Section 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

See also  Whether clerical error can be corrected after delay of twenty five years?
MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation