MyNation KnowledgeBase

Landmark Judgments and Articles on Law

Register to Download

Bail in Cyber Crime Cases underneath S.420/468/471 IPC R/W Sec.66-c/66-D IT Act 2000.


BLAPL NO. 5963 Of 2017

An focus underneath territory 439 of a Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 in tie with CID C.B. Cyber Crime P.S.Case No.12 of 2016 analogous to C.T. Case No.3811 of 2017 tentative in a Court of schooled S.D.J.M., Bhubaneswar.

Obinna Nicodemus Enweka @ Obina Icodemus …….. Petitioner


State of Orissa                     ……..                             Opp.
For Petitioner                    Mr. Goutam Mishra   For Opp. party                   –
Mr. JanmejayaKatikia              Addl. Govt. Advocate

P R E S E N T:


Date of Argument: 14.11.2017
Date of order: 22.11.2017

A twenty one year immature child has knocked during a portals of this Court for bail. He is endangered in cybercrime. The demeanour in that a crime has been committed shows a diabolical master mindedness, cold thinking, tricks adopted, organised bid and timely execution of devise of a offenders. The comprehension and modernized form of believe on cyber seems to have been utilized in a wrong way. Sitting somewhere distant from a plant and though carrying any approach earthy entrance to her, a cybercriminal has caused unthinkable mistreat to her with touches of his fingers on a mechanism and stolen some-more than what an typical rapist could have finished with gun. The plant of a orderly crime appears to be an trusting lady fell into a trap of immorality design. With a enticement of removing unfamiliar gifts, she acted like a witless fondle in a hands of a criminals compartment she realised one day that she had been cheated on a mistaken impression.

The law was set into suit with a display of a initial information news by Sukanti Mohanty during Cyber Crime Police Station of C.I.D., C.B., Cuttack on a indictment that she had turn a plant of orderly cybercrime and had paid a sum of Rs.17,03,390/- to opposite persons by their bank accounts that were supposing to her by e-mail/sms /whatsapp. She purported opposite one chairman identifying himself as Frank Young on facebook had sent her a friend’s ask that she accepted. The indicted sensitive a adviser that he had sent her some gifts that were hold adult in Delhi from where she should collect a gifts. The adviser was asked by a series of calls and e-mails for income on several pretexts i.e. remittance, unfamiliar exchange, send etc. The phone calls and sms were perceived from opposite numbers and a people who identified themselves as Frank, Marc, confidence personnel, R.B.I. officials and Airport officials etc. suggested and assured a adviser to deposition income in opposite bank accounts supposing by them. The income was paid in 4 opposite bank accounts of 4 opposite persons by a adviser totalling to Rs.17,03,390/-.

See also  Exhibition of documents at subsequent stage is permissible?

On such initial information report, C.I.D.C.B. Cyber Crime P.S. Case No.12 antiquated 26.08.2016 was purebred under sections 419/420/468/471 of a Indian Penal Code and section 66-C/66-D of a Information Technology Act, 2000.

During march of investigation, a adviser and other witnesses were examined. The papers relating to deposition of money, accounts matter of a informant’s bank comment as good as some other applicable papers were seized. Requisitions under section 91 of Cr.P.C. were sent to a endangered banks to yield A/c opening forms sum along with adult to date comment matter and other required information for marker of a comment holders. Immediate correspondence were also done with endangered mobile use providers to discern a subscriber information as good as call sum to discern a temperament and plcae of a dungeon phone numbers that were used in creation hit with a informant. While conducting questioning during New Delhi, it was guarded that vast sum of income was deposited in a bank accounts of fraudsters and a same was immediately being eliminated to many other bank accounts in smaller amounts by internet banking and shortly after that a smaller amounts were cold immediately by ATMs in no time withdrawal really small or no change in a customer accounts. The endangered bend managers were requested to withdraw solidify a customer accounts. On 08.10.2016, a Inspector of Cyber Crime, Goa intimated a questioning officer by e-mail that dual Nigerian nationals i.e. a postulant and another have been arrested on 03.10.2016 by Goa military and during interrogation, it was guarded that they are endangered in a crime in Orissa by defrauding a adviser by regulating dual mobile numbers. During corroboration of a mobile numbers and call annals perceived from a mobile use providers, it seemed that a dual mobile numbers are common in Odisha Cyber Crime box and Goa Cyber Crime case. The questioning officer perceived CDR and CAF in honour of some of a mobile numbers and analyzed them. From a CDR of a mobile phones, it became clear that a fraudster had prompted a adviser by creation write call and sms and a dual mobile numbers that were used in dual IMEIs were seized by a Cybercrime officials of Delhi and Goa. It was guarded during march of review that a postulant and another co-accused had turn friends with a adviser by e-mail/sms/whatsapp. Finding sufficient prima facie justification opposite a petitioner, assign piece was submitted on 27.02.2017 opposite a postulant and another co-accused under sections 419/420/468/471 of a Indian Penal Code and sections 66-C/66-D of a Information Technology Act gripping a serve review open under section 173(8)of Cr.P.C.

See also  Baseless allegations without Evidence filed to Pressurize husband and Terrorize the in-laws.

The postulant changed an focus for bail before a schooled Addl. Sessions Judge, Bhubaneswar in Bail Application No.201/904 of 2017 that was deserted vide sequence antiquated 02.08.2017.

Mr. Gautam Mishra, schooled warn appearing for a postulant contended that a postulant has been unnecessarily victimized and he is in no approach endangered in a purported elect of a offences and he has already remained in control for a estimable duration and has undergone extensive hardship and mental anguish and assign piece has already been submitted. It is serve settled by a schooled warn for a postulant that a postulant has been postulated bail in a Goa box by a J.M.F.C., Mapusa, Goa and he has filed a bail sequence copy. He serve submitted that there is no possibility of tampering with a justification and therefore, a bail focus might be agreeably considered.

Mr. Janmejaya Katikia, schooled Additional Government Advocate on a other palm contended that there is not usually sufficient justification opposite a postulant relating to his impasse in a crime though also a serve review of a box is underneath swell and once a postulant is expelled on bail, there is odds of tampering with a evidence. It is serve contended that a postulant is endangered in committing identical offences in other States also and therefore, a bail focus should be rejected. Learned warn filed a box annals as good as some critical papers in a hermetic envelope.

Adverting to a contentions lifted by a schooled counsels for a particular parties and after going by a box records, it appears that there are sufficient prima facie evidence to uncover that due to provocation of a petitioner, a adviser deposited a sum of Rs.17,03,390/- in 4 accounts, 3 belonged to S.B.I. and one belonged to Central Bank of India. From a pronounced accounts, a postulant had eliminated income by online comment send to customer accounts and a indicted persons have cold income by ATM withdrawal a really immaterial volume in a account. The limit withdrawal have been effected regulating ATM cards and a Branch Managers of a endangered banks such as State Bank of Travancore, State Bank of Mysore, UCO Bank, Union Bank and State Bank of Hyderabad etc. settled that a comment holders never revisit a bend and have cold income usually by ATM. It is clear that a adviser has deposited income in 4 accounts of opposite persons that are feign due to provocation by a postulant by online send from her accounts and shortly after her deposit, a income was eliminated by internet banking in smaller amounts to several customer accounts that are in opposite banks in New Delhi. It serve appears that a postulant visited India in a feign Visa on health ground.


Considering a inlet and sobriety of a accusation, a inlet of ancillary evidence, a demeanour in that the informant has been cheated with a outrageous amount, a astringency of punishment in box of conviction, a reasonable confinement of tampering with a justification quite when a serve review is underneath swell and a rapist inclination of a petitioner, we am not prone to accept a request for bail of a petitioner.

Accordingly, a BLAPL focus stands rejected.

S.K. Sahoo, J.
Orissa High Court, Cuttack

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link
MyNation Times Magzine

All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Important SC/HC Judgements on 498A IPC
Rules and Regulations of India.


CopyRight @ MyNation

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, though No Lawyer will give we Advice like We do

Please review Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You determine afterwards Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We hoop Women Centric inequitable laws like False Section 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

See also  SC : Marriage during pendency of appeal against Divorce Decree not Void, if Appeal filed beyond time
MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation