IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI
A.B.A. No. 6060 of 2017
1.Shiv Kumar Pandey
2.Nakul Pandey @ Nakul Kumar Pandey…….. Petitioners
Vs.
State of Jharkhand and Anr …… ………………………. Opp Party
For a Petitioners :- Mrs. Rashmi Kumar
Advocate For a State :- A.P.P
For a O.P. No.2 :-Mr. Deepak Kumar Advocate
CORAM :- HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RATNAKER BHENGRA
4/ Dated 5.1.2018:
Heard schooled warn for a parties.
The schooled warn for a petitioners has settled that a whole charge box is fake and concocted. The schooled warn for a petitioners has referred to Annexure-1 and pronounced that for a purpose of vilifying a petitioners and their family, a censure box has been filed opposite them, nonetheless a petitioners and a complainant are tighten kin though referred as Gotias. The schooled warn for a petitioners has serve submitted that there is a prolonged station land brawl between a parties. The schooled warn for a petitioners has serve settled that a complainant has filed a box opposite 3 teenager children after display their age secretly as 19 years, 20 years and 18 years respectively though when they had seemed before a endangered justice next on a 22.8.2017 a schooled justice next found prima facie that they are juvenile. The schooled warn for a petitioners serve settled that a purported land belongs to a petitioners or corner skill and a complainant is perplexing to erect a toilet on indistinct or claimed land and when a postulant objected to a same, a fake box has been lodged opposite a petitioners. The schooled warn for a petitioners serve settled that when a box was lodged, a postulant no.1, in march of investigation, has come to know that a aforesaid purported land has been sole by a complainant’s father to a complainant by sale help on remuneration of care volume of Rs.Four lakh sixty one thousand dual hundred only. The petitioners will be contesting a bootleg sale. The schooled warn for a petitioners has serve settled that mixed corruption has been purported in a censure petition opposite a petitioners. The schooled warn for a petitioners serve settled that when a postulant objected to a construction of a toilet, afterwards they have also been dragged in a fake case. It is serve settled that to harass a petitioners, complainant has again filed a censure box underneath territory 323/498A/379/504 of a Indian Penal Code and 3 /4 of a Witch Craft Act.
The schooled warn for a complainant against a bail and pronounced that a purported land belongs to a complainant.
Having left by a box annals and after conference a parties we am prone to extend anticipatory bail to a petitioners and accordingly, petitioners above named are destined to obey in a justice next within dual weeks from currently and on such obey they shall be expelled on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/-(Rupees twenty thousand) any with dual sureties of a like volume any to a compensation of Judicial Magistrate,Ist Class Koderma in tie with Complaint Case No. 82 of 2017 theme to a conditions as laid down underneath territory 438(2) of a Code of Criminal Procedure.
(Ratnaker Bhengra,J.) SD