MyNation KnowledgeBase

Landmark Judgments and Articles on Law

Register to Download

Living Seperately Fit case for Anticiparoty Bail in 498A

Delhi High Court

Kamlesh vs State (Nct Of Delhi) on 8 October, 2007

Bench: S N Dhingra

ORDER

Shiv Narayan Dhingra, J.

1. This application under Section 438, Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail has been made by the applicant, who is sister-in-law of the deceased. She has been booked under Sections 498A/304B, IPC. The couple in this case was living at Khera Garhi, Gaon Khera Kalan, Delhi while sister-in-law along with her family was living in Murthal (Haryana). She was married for 23 years and was living separately. The allegation against the sister-in- law/ applicant is that she used to instigate the husband of the deceased. A perusal of the complaint lodged by the father of the deceased gives an impression as if the present applicant was living in the house of the deceased itself. One allegation made in complaint is that an amount of Rs. 50,000/- was handed over by the parents of the girl to sister-in-law and mother-in-law. A general allegation has been made that deceased used to be physically and mentally tortured by husband, mother-in-law and sister-in-law. It is nowhere stated in the complaint that sister-in-law used to live separate and used to come to the house of the deceased from her matrimonial home. During arguments of bail application, the State Counsel stated that though the sister-in-law was living separate but she used to visit the matrimonial home of the deceased.

2. Looking into the fact that the applicant was a married woman and living far away from the house of the deceased and her husband and she was having a family and children I consider it is a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail. It is directed that in case of arrest, the applicant be released on her executing personal bond in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the IO/SHO concerned.

See also  Whether the court can grant default bail to the accused if the police fail to file a supplementary charge sheet within 90 days from the date of his arrest?

The application stands disposed of.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link
MyNation Times Magzine


All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Important SC/HC Judgements on 498A IPC
Rules and Regulations of India.

STUDY REPORTS

CopyRight @ MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Section 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

See also  304B & 498A discharge
MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation