MyNation KnowledgeBase

Landmark Judgments and Articles on Law

Register to Download

SAMPLE – Maintenance Petition u/s.125 CrPc

IN THE COURT OF MS. SUNAINA SHARMA, M.M., DISTT. EAST, KARKARDOOMA COURTS, DELHI

MAINTENANCE PETITION NO.______/2009

IN THE MATTER OF:

SMT. NEHA …PETITIONER

VERSUS

SH. HARINDER SINGH …RESPONDENT

REPLY ON AND BEHALF OF RESPONDENT TO THE APPLICATION FOR AD-INTERIM ON BEHALF OF THE PETITIONER.

MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH:

1. That the contents of para 1 of the application are partly admitted and partly wrong and denied. It is denied that the petitioner has no source of income and is unable to earn her livelihood and to maintainable herself. It is denied that petitioner has no moveable and immoveable property or income to maintain herself.

2. That the contents of para 2 of the application are admitted.

3. That the contents of para 3 of the application are wrong and denied. It is denied that the applicant require a sum of Rs.5,000/- p.m. for her interim maintenance allowance for her maintenance and hence seeks an order from this Hon’ble Court as prayed for in the main petition.

4. The contents of para 4 of the application are matter of record and the contents of the reply to the said petition may kindly be read as part and parcel of this application, which are not reproduced herein for the sake of brevity.

The prayer clause of the application is wrong and denied in toto. The application of the petitioners are liable to be dismissed with exemplary costs.

DELHI: RESPONDENT
DATED:18.08.2010

THROUGH
PRASAD SINGH
ADVOCATE
SEAT NO.69, CIVIL WING,
TIS HAZARI COURTS,
DELHI-110054

IN THE COURT OF MS. SUNAINA SHARMA, M.M., DISTT. EAST, KARKARDOOMA COURTS, DELHI

MAINTENANCE PETITION NO.______/2009

IN THE MATTER OF:

SMT. NEHA …PETITIONER
VERSUS
SH. HARINDER SINGH …RESPONDENT

AFFIDAVIT

I, Harinder Singh, S/o Sh. Jender Singh, R/o Village – Bhabhisha, Tehsil – Budhana, Distt. Muzaffar Nagar (U.P.) presently at Delhi, do hereby solemnly affirm and declare as under:-
1. That the deponent is the respondent in the above noted case and is well conversant with the facts of the case and is competent to swear this affidavit.

2. That the contents of the accompanying reply to the petition under Section 125 Cr.P.C. has been drafted by my counsel under my instructions and the contents of the same have been read over and explained to me and I have understood the same and are not repeated herein for the sake of brevity.
DEPONENT
VERIFICATION:

Verified at Delhi on this 18th day of the August, 2010 that the contents of the above affidavit are true to my knowledge and no part of it is false and nothing material has been concealed therefrom.

DEPONENT

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2018 MyNation KnowledgeBase
eXTReMe Tracker
×

Free Legal Help just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please to read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registrationJOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women centric biased laws like False 498A, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307,312, 313,323 376, 377, 406, 420, 506, 509; and also TEP, RTI etc

Web Design BangladeshWeb Design BangladeshMymensingh