MyNation KnowledgeBase

Landmark Judgments and Articles on Law

Tag: 13B. Divorce by mutual consent

Can’t allow misuse of Section 125 CrPC by wives who want to sit idle

Posted on      by      Leave a comment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 217 CRR-F-248-2019(O&M) Date of order: 18.09.2024 Meetu @ Ritu …..Petitioner(s) Vs. Amandeep …..Respondent(s) CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr.Munish Kumar Garg, Advocate for the petitioners. ***** 1.Challenge in the present petition is to the…

Continue Reading… Can’t allow misuse of Section 125 CrPC by wives who want to sit idle

Whether order of Maintenance U/S 125 of CrPC can be enforced as a Money decree of a civil court as per the provisions of the CPC?

Posted on      by      Leave a comment

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 730 OF 2020 RAJNESH Vs NEHA Anr Dated: November 4, 2020. Read full Judgment here: Click here

Can the court enforce a settlement done in mediation if one party contends that he was compelled to sign a mediation agreement?

Posted on      by      Leave a comment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM OP(CRL.) NO. 390 OF 2020 MATHEW DANIEL Vs LEENA MATHEW,   PRESENT : DR. JUSTICE KAUSER EDAPPAGATH Dated: 16th day of August, 2022. Read full Judgment here: Click here

SC: Courts cannot prepone date of hearing without giving notice to other party

Posted on      by      Leave a comment

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.2394/2023 RANJIT SINGH ANR. Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND ORS. Author: ABHAY S OKA, J. Citation: 2024 INSC 724. Dated: SEPTEMBER 12, 2024. Read full Judgment here: Click here.

SC: Defendant can cross-examine plaintiff even if suit is proceeding Ex-Parte against him & Written statement isn’t filed

Posted on      by      2 Comments

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.2394/2023 RANJIT SINGH ANR. Vs  STATE OF UTTARAKHAND ORS. Author: ABHAY S OKA, J. Citation: 2024 INSC 724. Dated: SEPTEMBER 12, 2024. 1. The appellants are the defendants in a suit filed by the first respondent and…

Continue Reading… SC: Defendant can cross-examine plaintiff even if suit is proceeding Ex-Parte against him & Written statement isn’t filed

Sexual Intercourse between husband and wife even if forcible cannot be considered rape

Posted on      by      1 Comment

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Crl.A./372/2023 MD. FARID ALI S/O MD.KASIM ALI, VILL.- JAGIROAD RAM MANDIR, NAKHOLA, P.S.- JAGIROAD, DIST.- MORIGAON, ASSAM. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR. THROUGH THE P.P., ASSAM. 2:NARENDRA…

Continue Reading… Sexual Intercourse between husband and wife even if forcible cannot be considered rape

‘Highly Objectionable’: SC Criticises Patna HC remark that Widow has no use of Make-up

Posted on      by      Leave a comment

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1031 OF 2015 VIJAY SINGH@VIJAY KR. SHARMA Vs THE STATE OF BIHAR Author: SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA, J. Citation: 2024 INSC 735, 1. On 30.08.1985, Neelam breathed her last in Simaltalla, PS Sikandra, District Munger,…

Continue Reading… ‘Highly Objectionable’: SC Criticises Patna HC remark that Widow has no use of Make-up

SC: When a continuing wrong gives rise to a recurring cause of action?

Posted on      by      Leave a comment

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Civil Appeal No. 7510 of 1995 Decided On: 21.08.1995 M.R. Gupta Vs. Union of India (UOI) and Ors. Hon’ble Judges/Coram: J.S. Verma and K. Venkataswami, JJ. Citation: MANU/SC/0172/1996,(1995)5 SCC 628 1. Leave granted. 2. The only question for decision is…

Continue Reading… SC: When a continuing wrong gives rise to a recurring cause of action?

SC: The period excluded U/S 14 of Limitation Act can not be counted for computing period for condonation of delay

Posted on      by      Leave a comment

In the Supreme Court of India (Before Sanjiv Khanna and J.K. Maheshwari, JJ.) Laxmi Srinivasa R and P Boiled Rice Mill Vs State of Andhra Pradesh and Another. Civil Appeal No. of 2022 (@SLP(C) No. 11225 of 2022) Decided on November 14, 2022 Citation: 2022 SCC…

Continue Reading… SC: The period excluded U/S 14 of Limitation Act can not be counted for computing period for condonation of delay

Madras HC: It is not necessary to examine attesting witness to prove Agreement of sale

Posted on      by      Leave a comment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADRAS C.R.P. (PD) Nos. 2927, 2930 of 2022, Decided On: 08.08.2024 S. Suresh Vs. K. Vijayalakshmi and Ors. Hon’ble Judges/Coram: V. Lakshminarayanan, J. Citation: MANU/TN/4585/2024. 1. These two civil revision petitions arise against the order passed by the learned III Additional…

Continue Reading… Madras HC: It is not necessary to examine attesting witness to prove Agreement of sale

Not found ...?HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link
MyNation Times Magzine
COMPARATIVE TABLES
IPC and BNS(Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita)
CRPC and BNSS(Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023)
Evidence Act and BSA(Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam)
All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Important SC/HC Judgements on 498A IPC
Rules and Regulations of India.

STUDY REPORTS

Dowry Law Proposal.
Report on 498A.
Report on DVAct
Report on Indian Husbands.
eMpower Women by DiseMpowering Men
MyNation Proposal for Paternity Act
Study Report on Marital Rape
MISUSE OF ANTI-DOWRY LAWS IN MARITAL DISPUTES
CopyRight @ MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Section 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation