MyNation KnowledgeBase

Landmark Judgments and Articles on Law

Whether prosecution can cross-examine hostile witness with his statement recorded by investigating officer who was not authorized to investigate the case?

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD FULL BENCH Decided On: 29.04.1949 Shyamlal Sharma Vs. King-Emperor Authored By : Seth, Raghubar Dayal, Wanchoo Author: Seth, J. Citation: MANU/UP/0019/1949,AIR 1949 All 483 1. These two references to this Full Bench have been connected together because the questions referred…

Statement given to Police is not punishable under Section 182 Cr. P. C. as its not given on Oath

Kerala High Court State Of Kerala vs Markose on 17 November, 1961 Equivalent citations: AIR 1962 Ker 78 b Author: G Menon Bench: S V Pillai, P G Menon JUDGMENT Govinda Menon, J. 1. This appeal has been filed by the State challenging the legality…

Whether S 163 of Evidence Act is applicable to Criminal law?

IN THE HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA Decided On: 27.02.1930 Government of Bengal Vs. Santiram Mondal Citation: AIR 1930 Cal 370 1. This is an appeal by Government against an order of acquittal passed on the unanimous verdict of a jury on charges under Sections 194,…

Whether S 163 of Evidence Act is applicable to documents produced before court under O 11 R 14 of CPC?

Andhra High Court Rajesh Bhatia And Ors. vs G. Parimala And Anr. on 30 November, 2005 Bench: T C Rao ORDER T. Ch. Surya Rao, J. 1. Inasmuch as both these revision petitions emanate from a common order dated 20-12-2004 passed by the learned VIII…

Language of Court ? English, Hindi or Vernacular ?

Gujarat High Court Sajal Sureshkumar Jain vs State Of Gujarat on 16 February, 2005 Equivalent citations: (2005) 2 GLR 1716 Bench: D Trivedi JUDGMENT D.K. Trivedi, J. 1. The petitioner accused has moved this court and filed Revision Application, as he was one of the…

Landmark judgment on discharge of accused and framing of charge

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON : 20th MARCH, 2015 DECIDED ON : 15th MAY, 2015 CRL.REV.P. 162/2014 & Crl.M.A.4214/2014 STATE ….. Petitioner Through : Mr.Atul Kumar Shrivastava, SPP.Insp.Vijay and Insp.Jitender, Crime Branch. Versus BHUPINDER SINGH BISHT & ORS. ….. Respondents…

On what grounds Magistrate can reject application of accused

Bombay High Court Angadh S/O. Rohidas Kadam, … vs The State Of Maharashtra And … on 12 December, 2006 Equivalent citations: 2007 (109) Bom L R 34 Bench: B Gavai JUDGMENT B.R. Gavai, J. 1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard by consent. 2. By…

Copyright © 2021 MyNation KnowledgeBase
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Section 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation