MyNation KnowledgeBase

Landmark Judgments and Articles on Law

Perjury – Suo Moto Proceedings Against false statement

Supreme Court of India CASE NO.:Writ Petition (civil) 77 of 2001 PETITIONER:RE: SUO MOTO PROCEEDINGS AGAINST MR. R, KARUPPAN, ADVOCATE RESPONDENT:RE: SUO MOTO PROCEEDINGS AGAINST MR. R, KARUPPAN, ADVOCATE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 12/05/2001 BENCH:K.T. THOMAS & R.P. SETHI & B.N, AGRAWAL JUDGMENT: JUDGMENT 2001 (3)…

Is false implication fabrication of evidence

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(Crl.) Nos.35/07, 36/07, 37/07, 38/07, 39/07, 56/07, 438/07 and 634/07 RESERVED ON: December 07, 2007 DATE OF DECISION: February 15, 2008 (1) W.P.(Crl.) Nos.35/07 SHYNI VARGHESE ORS. ….Petitioners through: Mr. Harish Salve, Senior Advocate with Mr. Ashish…

False Implication Becomes Fabrication Of False Evidence.

Delhi High Court Shyni Varghese And Ors. vs State (Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi) And … on 15 February, 2008 Equivalent citations: 147 (2008) DLT 691 Bench: R Khetrapal JUDGMENT Reva Khetrapal, J. 1. The petitioners seek issuance of an appropriate writ/order/direction in the nature…

Copyright © 2018 MyNation KnowledgeBase
eXTReMe Tracker
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

Web Design BangladeshWeb Design BangladeshMymensingh