MyNation KnowledgeBase

Landmark Judgments and Articles on Law

How much of information received from accused U/S 27 of Evidence Act may be proved?

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH BENCH AT INDORE Criminal Revision No.404 of 2017 Gyanchand Jain Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh Dated:18/06/2018 (1) While framing charge, the trial Court in exercise of the power under section 228 Cr.P.C., has to form an opinion judicially for its prima facie…

Documents can be filed by accused at the time of framing of charge?

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT CRIMINAL REVISION No. – 4117 of 2016 Satendra Kumar Mishra. Vs State Of U.P. Another Hon’ble Amar Singh Chauhan,J. Heard Shri Ravindra Prakash Srivastav, learned counsel for the revisionists, learned Additional Government Advocate for the State, Shri Anoop Kumar Pandey, learned counsel…

Supreme Court: 376/Rape Quash based based on Malafide Intention & Wreaking vengeance

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.577 OF 2017 (ARISING OUT OF SLP(CRL.) No.287 OF 2017) VINEET KUMAR & ORS. …. APPELLANTS VERSUS STATE OF U.P. & ANR. …. RESPONDENTS J U D G M E N T ASHOK BHUSHAN,…

Copyright © 2018 MyNation KnowledgeBase
eXTReMe Tracker
×

Free Legal Help just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please to read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registrationJOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women centric biased laws like False 498A, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307,312, 313,323 376, 377, 406, 420, 506, 509; and also TEP, RTI etc

Web Design BangladeshWeb Design BangladeshMymensingh