MyNation KnowledgeBase

Landmark Judgments and Articles on Law

Maintenance u/s.125, Territorial jurisdiction

Supreme Court of India CASE NO.:Appeal (crl.) 431 of 2004 PETITIONER:Vijay Kumar Prasad RESPONDENT:State of Bihar & Ors. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 07/04/2004 BENCH:DORAISWAMY RAJU & ARIJIT PASAYAT. JUDGMENT: Leave granted. The present case reflects a sad state of affairs, as it involves a fight between…

Time Limit to accept written statement along with Application

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 6731 OF 2008 (Arising out of SLP (C) No. 14562 of 2006) Sambhaji & Ors. …Appellants Versus Gangabai & Ors. …Respondents JUDGMENT Dr. ARIJIT PASAYAT, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. Challenge in this…

Challenging the legality of the order – Name Removal

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CASE NO.:Appeal (crl.) 420 of 2006 PETITIONER:Minu Kumari and Anr. RESPONDENT:The State of Bihar and Ors. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 12/04/2006 BENCH:ARIJIT PASAYAT S.H. KAPADIA JUDGMENT: J U D G M E N T (Arising out of (SLP (Crl.) No. 4607 of…

SC quash 498a where HC upheld without checking its discrepancies

Supreme Court of India CASE NO.:Appeal (crl.) 1375 of 1999 PETITIONER:V.N. Ratheesh RESPONDENT:State of Kerala DATE OF JUDGMENT: 06/07/2006 BENCH: ARIJIT PASAYAT, LOKESHWAR SINGH PANTA JUDGMENT: J U D G M E N T ARIJIT PASAYAT, J. Appellant calls in question legality of the judgment…

If two views are possible,

Supreme Court of India CASE NO.:Appeal (crl.) 815-816 of 1996 PETITIONER:State of Rajasthan Vs. RESPONDENT: Raja Ram DATE OF JUDGMENT: 13/08/2003 BENCH: DORAISWAMY RAJU ARIJIT PASAYAT. JUDGMENT: J U D G M E N T ARIJIT PASAYAT, J. The State of Rajasthan is in appeal…

Whether presence of Investigating Officer at the time of trial is must?

Supreme Court of India CASE NO.:Appeal (crl.) 1218 of 2001 PETITIONER:SHAILENDRA KUMAR Vs. RESPONDENT:STATE OF BIHAR AND OTHERS DATE OF JUDGMENT: 28/11/2001 BENCH:M.B. Shah, B.N. Agrawal & Arijit Pasayat JUDGMENT: Shah, J. Leave granted. This appeal has been filed against the judgment and order dated…

Order VIII Rule 1 and 90 Days with extension in an exception

Supreme Court of India CASE NO.: Appeal (civil) 5066 of 2005 PETITIONER:Smt. Rani Kusum RESPONDENT:Smt. Kanchan Devi and Ors. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 16/08/2005 BENCH: ARIJIT PASAYAT & H.K. SEMA JUDGMENT: J U D G M E N T (Arising out of SLP (C) No. 377…

Landmark Judgment on Secondary Evidence

Supreme Court of India CASE NO.:Appeal (civil) 2060 of 2007 PETITIONER:Smt. J. Yashoda RESPONDENT:Smt. K. Shobha Rani DATE OF JUDGMENT: 19/04/2007 BENCH:Dr. ARIJIT PASAYAT & LOKESHWAR SINGH PANTA JUDGMENT: J U D G M E N T (Arising out of S.L.P. (C) No.12625 of 2005)…

Whether relief claimed constitute cause of action?

Supreme Court of India CASE NO.:Appeal (civil) 448 of 2004 PETITIONER:Sopan Sukhdeo Sable & Ors. RESPONDENT:Assistant Charity Commissioner & Ors. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 23/01/2004 BENCH:DORAISWAMY RAJU & ARIJIT PASAYAT JUDGMENT: J U D G M E N T (Arising out of SLP (Civil) No. 20366/2002)…

Section 34 of IPC is only a rule of evidence and does not create a substantive offence.

Supreme Court of India Bench: Doraiswamy Raju, Arijit Pasayat. CASE NO.:Appeal (crl.) 622-624 of 2003 PETITIONER:Anil Sharma & Ors. RESPONDENT:State of Jharkhand DATE OF JUDGMENT: 30/04/2004 BENCH:DORAISWAMY RAJU & ARIJIT PASAYAT. JUDGMENT:J U D G M E N T With Crl.A. No. 798 of 2003…

Copyright © 2019 MyNation KnowledgeBase
eXTReMe Tracker
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

Web Design BangladeshWeb Design BangladeshMymensingh