MyNation KnowledgeBase

Landmark Judgments and Articles on Law

Tag: case transfer

Transfer petition dismiss

Posted on      by      Leave a comment

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Decided on August 29,2005 Case number 191 of 2005 Anindita Das Appellant VERSUS Srijit Das Respondents JUDGEMENT 1. This transfer petition has been filed by the wife on the ground that the petitioner has a small child of six years. She…

Continue Reading… Transfer petition dismiss

Whether case can be transferred as per convenience of witness?

Posted on      by      Leave a comment

Andhra High Court THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M. SEETHARAMA MURTI ransfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition No.599 of 2016 29-12-2016 Pallerla Srinivasa Reddy and another.Petitioners Vs. Pallerla Subba Reddy and five others. Respondents Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri J. Rajeswar Counsel for 1st Respondent: Sri G.V. Ramana…

Continue Reading… Whether case can be transferred as per convenience of witness?

Sister-in-law 498A quash

Posted on      by      Leave a comment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc. No.M-31712 of 2004 Date of Decision: 23.05.2011 Santosh Jakhar….Petitioner Versus State of Haryana & another…Respondents CORAM : Hon’ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present:- Mr. Salil Bali, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sidharth Sarup,…

Continue Reading… Sister-in-law 498A quash

498A quash,s482,In-laws, and Territorial jurisdiction

Posted on      by      Leave a comment

Supreme Court of India CASE NO.:Appeal (crl.) 372 of 2005 PETITIONER:Ramesh and Ors. RESPONDENT:State of Tamil Nadu DATE OF JUDGMENT: 03/03/2005 BENCH:P. Venkatarama Reddi & A.K. Mathur JUDGMENT:JUDGMENT ORDER Leave granted. The two appeals filed by five accused (three in one case and two in…

Continue Reading… 498A quash,s482,In-laws, and Territorial jurisdiction

Mere presumption or apprehension is not sufficient for a case to be transferred

Posted on      by      Leave a comment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH TA No.601 of 2011 Date of decision: 4.1.2012 Harjinder Kaur….Applicant Versus Narinder Singh Mangat…Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE JITENDRA CHAUHAN Present: Mr.Gopal Sharma, Advocate for the applicant. Mr.Arvind Kashyap, Advocate for the respondent ***** Jitendra Chauhan,…

Continue Reading… Mere presumption or apprehension is not sufficient for a case to be transferred
CopyRight @ MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Section 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation