MyNation KnowledgeBase

Landmark Judgments and Articles on Law

Sections 498-A to DP3 for 304B

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 160 OF 2006 G.V. Siddaramesh ………….. Appellant Versus State of Karnataka …………..Respondent J U D G M E N T H.L. Dattu, J. This criminal appeal arises out of common judgment and order…

498A, DP3 and misuse of Law

Refer : >> http://mynation.net/docs/137-2010/

Suicide note alone will not prove the cruelty in 498A

Supreme Court of India Smt. Raj Rani vs State (Delhi Administration) on 8 February, 2000 Bench: K Thomas, D Mohapatra JUDGMENT 1. Appellant is Smt. Raj Rani whose brother Shashi Pal Malhotra had married one Veena in the year 1978. The said Veena committed suicide…

Cogent evidence is required to charge under 498a

Supreme Court of India Bench: Umesh C. Banerjee, Y.K. Sabharwal CASE NO.:Appeal (crl.) 463 of 1996 PETITIONER:GIRDHAR SHANKAR TAWADE RESPONDENT:STATE OF MAHARASHTRA DATE OF JUDGMENT: 24/04/2002 BENCH:UMESH C. BANERJEE & Y.K. SABHARWAL JUDGMENT:JUDGMENT 2002 (3) SCR 376 The Judgment of the Court was delivered by…

Copyright © 2021 MyNation KnowledgeBase
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Section 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation