MyNation KnowledgeBase

Landmark Judgments and Articles on Law

Whether husband is entitled to get divorce if he fails to pay interim maintenance?

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 16 OF 2003 Sanjeev Vyankatesh Ranade, Age 41 years, Occ:-Business, Residing at 17/A/6, Vijay Bunglow, Near Ashwamedh Hall, Erandwana,Karve Road, Pune- 411 004. …Appellant Versus Meghna Sanjeev Ranade, Age 39…

Decree for restitution of conjugal rights enforces cohabitation but it cannot force Sexual intercourse

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: October 04, 2016 Judgment Delivered on: October 07, 2016 MAT.APP.(F.C.) 64/2015 SUDHA GUPTA ….. Appellant Represented by: Mr.Om Saran Gupta, Advocate versus HAR PRASAD GUPTA ….. Respondent Represented by: Respondent in person CORAM:…

When Challenging decree for restitution of conjugal rights under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act infructuous

Andhra High Court F.C.A. Nos.176 OF 2008 AND 60 OF 2010 14-07-2014 Smt.K.Kavith… Appellant Shiva Shankar.. Respondent Counsel for the appellant: Dr. P.B. Vijay Kumar Counsel for the respondent:Sri A. Chandraiah Naidu Sri K. Chaitanya <GIST: HEAD NOTE: CASES REFERRED: 1. 1977 AIR 2218 2….

125 CrPc maintenance claim after the decree of restitution of conjugal rights

IN THE PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH CRR(F)-67-2013 Date of decision : 09.04.2014 Raj Kumar… Petitioner Versus Sunita Devi and another… Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE REKHA MITTAL Present: Mr.Som Nath Saini, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Vivek Khatri, Advocate for the respondents….

Divorce if decree for restitution of conjugal rights is not obeyed by wife

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 32 OF 2004 Arun s/o Narayanrao Marathe Age 48 years, Occ. Service R/o. N.T.P.S. M.S.E.B. Eklahare …Appellant Nashik (Ori. Petitioner) versus Varsha w/o Arun Marathe Age 43 years, Occ. Service…

Hindu Women And Restitution Of Conjugal Rights

Supreme Court of India PETITIONER: SMT. SAROJ RANI Vs. RESPONDENT: SUDARSHAN KUMAR CHADHA DATE OF JUDGMENT08/08/1984 BENCH:MUKHARJI, SABYASACHI (J). FAZALALI, SYED MURTAZA CITATION: 1984 AIR 1562 1985 SCR (1) 303 1984 SCC (4) 90 1984 SCALE (2)118 ACT: Constitution of India 1950, Articles 13,14 and 21. Remedy…

CopyRight @ MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, though No Lawyer will give we Advice like We do

Please review Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You determine afterwards Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We hoop Women Centric inequitable laws like False Section 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation