MyNation KnowledgeBase

Landmark Judgments and Articles on Law

Quash : No specific allegations of dowry Demand

IN THE COURT OF SH AJAY GUPTA: ADDITIONAL SESSION JUDGE-4 (SHAHDARA), KARKARDOOMA COURTS , DELHI Cr. Revision No. : 8/14 UID NO . 02402R0201292014 In the matter of Ms. Richa Bharti @ Kajal D/o Sh. Rakesh Thakur D/o, Sh. H.N. Singh W/o Arvind Bharti R/o,…

498A FIR Quash – Allegations are General in Nature

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-30163 of 2013 (O&M) Date of decision : 11.03.2015 Vijay Kumar Kaura and anr. ….Petitioners versus U.T. Chandigarh and another …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI Present: Mr. A.S. Narang, Advocate for…

No proof of dowry articles – Acquitted

In The Court of Ms. Shefali Barnala Tandon, MM, Mahila Court, NW, Rohini Courts, Delhi State v. Radhey Shyam & Others FIR No.66/1995 U/s 498­A/406/34 IPC PS: Adarsh Nagar JUDGMENT CIS No. : 535599/2016 S.No. of the Case : 1331/2 – 16/12/06 Unique ID No….

Recovery of Stridhan, Dowry articles petition Dismissed

In the Court of Sh. P.K. Matto, Additional District Judge­ (EAST) Karkardooma Courts, Delhi. RCA:12/09/07 Unique Case ID No.: 02402C0800462007 Date of Institution : 13.12.2007 Date of Reserving Judgment: 26.09.2013 Date on which judgment was pronounced: 07.10.2013 In Re: Smt Promila Kumari w/o late Shri…

F.I.R Quash, Vague allegations

Punjab-Haryana High Court Harsh Vardhan Arora vs Smt. Kavita Arora on 19 February, 2002 Equivalent citations: II (2002) DMC 22 Author: R Kathuria Bench: R Kathuria JUDGMENT R.C. Kathuria, J. 1. The petitioners seek quashing of complaint dated 23.7.1994 (Annexure P-3) filed by Kavita Arora…

Anticipatory bail in 498A after process of Sec.82 of Cr.P.C

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI BAIL APPLN. 1161/2012 Reserved on: 19th March , 2013 Decided on: 22nd March, 2013 MANJU GARG & ANR ….. Petitioners Through: Mr. M.N. Krishnamani, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Sameer Dubey, Mr.Arun K. Beriwal, Mr. Saurabh Kansal…

To recover dowry articles, In-Laws custodial interrogation is not required.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM No. M-26879 of 2010 Date of decision: 04.03.2011 Sudesh Kumari and another….Petitioners Versus State of Punjab….Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present: – Mr. Gaurav Mohunta,Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. K.D. Sachdeva, Addl….

Copyright © 2021 MyNation KnowledgeBase
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Section 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation