MyNation KnowledgeBase

Landmark Judgments and Articles on Law

Conflicting statements of Dowry in 304-b, charge removed

Rajasthan High Court Vishwa Kumar Sharma vs State Of Rajasthan And Anr. on 1 February, 2006 Equivalent citations: 2006 CriLJ 2096, I (2006) DMC 574, RLW 2006 (2) Raj 1123, 2006 (2) WLC 268 Bench: R Chauhan JUDGMENT R.S. Chauhan, J. 1. Within two days…

Acquitted – Urgent domestic expenses for purchasing manure cannot be termed as a demand for dowry

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJALSTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR J U D G M E N T 1. Amit Sharma S/o Prem Prakash 2. Prem Prakash S/o Ram Narain 3. Smt.Gayatri W/o Prem Prakash…..Appellants Versus State of Rajasthan…..Respondent (S.B.CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1096/2006) S.B.CRIMINAL…

Sections 406, 498-A, 323, 506 and 120- B IPC filled to grab Property Quashed

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM No.M-18643 of 2008 Date of Decision:- 21.2.2012 Smt.Sunita Goyal & Ors. …Petitioners Vs. State of Punjab & Anr. …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR Present:- Mr.Akshay Bhan, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr.Palwinder Singh,…

Acquitted in Section 498A/406 IPC r/w Section 34 IPC. No proof of dowry article

IN THE COURT OF MS. PRIYA MAHENDRA, METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE MAHILA COURT-02 (SOUTH WEST), DWARKA COURTS, NEW DELHI FIR NO: 851/06 PS: DABRI U/s: 498A/406/34 IPC STATE VS. GAJENDER SINGH JUDGMENT Date of institution : 06.02.2008 Name of the complainant : Smt. Babita Vs. Name &…

DP3 FIR format and explanation

DP means Dowry Prohibition Act. Under Sec 3&4 of the Act, Giving dowry as well as accepting dowry is illegal and the same is punishable. Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 sec 3. Penalty for giving or taking dowry. -(1) If any person, after the commencement of…

Divorce upheld by HC on Cruelty ground

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH FAO No.M-119 of 2010 Date of Decision: July 24, 2013 Smt. Bimla….Appellant Versus Kesar Dagar….Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JASPAL SINGH Present : Mr. Shiv Kumar, Advocate for the…

False allegations, False case cruelty Divorce

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI F.A.O. No. 80 of 1989 Decided On: 14.08.1991 Ashok Kumar Vs. Smt. Vijay Laxmi JUDGMENT 1. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 16-1-1989 of the Additional District Judge, Delhi by which she dismissed the appellant’s petition for…

Divorce upheld, Mental cruelty and Desertion

HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD Decided on September 12,2012 Arti Pandey Appellant VERSUS Vishnu Kant Tiwari Respondents Prakash Krishna, J.;— This is an appeal under section 19 of the family courts act 1984 at the instance of wife against the judgment and decree dated July 2011…

Divorce upheld, illicit relationship, false allegations of Section 498A

Madhya Pradesh High Court Madhuri Aswani vs Arjundas Aswani on 3 April, 2007 Bench: A Mishra, K Chauhan ORDER Arun Mishra, J. 1. This appeal has been preferred under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act, 1984 calling in question the judgment and decree dated 5-11-2003 passed…

Copyright © 2021 MyNation KnowledgeBase
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Section 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation