MyNation KnowledgeBase

Landmark Judgments and Articles on Law

Qualified Women, Interim maintenance denied in DV case

Order below Exh.3 in Cri.M.A. no. 07/2017 Dipali Pachangane vs. Prakash Pachangane (CNR – MHST09–000014-2017) Application seeking interim maintenance of Rs. 10,000/- from non-applicant no.1 Prakash Mohan Pachangane. Non-applicant no.1 is husband of applicant. It is averred that non-applicant no.1 Prakash Panchangane has source of…

DV filed after many years of separation Quashed

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 7552 of 2016 SARTHAK RAMNIKBHAI BHATTI & 3 other(s) Versus BINA SARTHAK BHATTI & 1 other(s) Appearance: MR. KULDEEP D VAIDYA(7045) for the Applicant(s) No. 1,2,3,4 ADITYA D DAVDA(8354) for the Respondent(s) No….

Women can be vacated from Parents residence if she remove Residence Rights underneath DV case

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM CR PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL THOMAS MONDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF JUNE 2018 / 28TH JYAISHTA, 1940 Crl.MC.No. 6784 of 2017 (AGAINST THE ORDER IN CMP NO.7085/2016 IN MC NO.65/2017 OF JFCMC I, VARKALA) PETITIONER(S)/RESPONDENT…

No Maintenance – Educated woman who can maintain herself

IN THE COURT OF MS. ANURADHA SHUKLA BHARDWAJ   ASJ­02 (EAST) KARKARDOOMA COURTS, DELHI CA No. 37/2014 Smt. Swati Kaushik W/o Sh. Ashwini Sharma R/o C­501, Nagarjuna Aparments,Mayurkunj, Near Chilla Regulator Delhi­110096  ………….Appellant Versus Sh. Ashwini Sharma S/o Sh. C. Paul Sharma R/o B­37, Cel Apartments, Plot No. B­14, Vasundhra Enclave New Delhi­110096  ………… Respondent ORDER 1. By this order I shall dispose of the appeal u/s 29 D.V. Act whereby appellant challenged the order dated 22/09/14. 2. The marriage between the parties is admitted and so is the birth of child. The parties has leveled allegations and counter allegations. The parties filed respective affidavits of income and assest before the trial court. After considering the prima facie case Ld. Trial Court held that the appellant/ wife was working with Tata Sky Ltd. She had a Master Diploma and she could maintain herself. The minor child, however, was granted a maintenance of Rs. 15,000/­ from the date of petition. Respondent was also granted Rs….

No DV – DIL Visiting In-laws is not shared household

IN THE COURT OF PRAVEEN KUMAR, SPECIAL JUDGE, PC ACT, CBI­III, ROHINI COURTS, DELHI Criminal Appeal No.70/15 Satish Solanki & Ors. ……..Appellants vs. Sujata ……..Respondent File received on assignment on : 03.10.2015 Arguments heard on : 15.12.2015 Judgment announced on : 22.12.2015 JUDGMENT: 1. This…

DV on In-Laws after Husband Death Quashed

IN THE COURT OF MS. VANDANA JAIN: MM-03: MAHILA COURT: SED: SAKET COURTS : NEW DELHI CC-237/1/15 Smt. Babita W/o Late Vinod D/o Sh. Mool Chand R/o 20/116, Dakshinpuri, Dr. Ambedkar Nagar, New Delhi at present resident of S-70/10, Jhuggies, Vijay Camp, Jal Vihar, Lajpat…

Family members of NRI husband cannot be accused in DV case

Refer : >> http://mynation.net/docs/253-2010/


Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link
MyNation Times Magzine


All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Important SC/HC Judgements on 498A IPC
Rules and Regulations of India.

STUDY REPORTS

CopyRight @ MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Section 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation