MyNation KnowledgeBase

Landmark Judgments and Articles on Law

False complaints by Wife eligible for Divorce

Allahabad High Court Smt. Archana vs Dr. P.K. Tomar on 4 February, 2003 Bench: B Rathi JUDGMENT : B.K. Rathi, J. 1. This is an appeal under Section 96 of the C.P.C. against the judgment and order dated 7.2.2002 passed by District Judge, Ghaziabad by…

MAINTENANCE OF WIVES, CHILDREN AND PARENTS

Section 125: Cr.P.C. Order for maintenance of wives, children and parents (1) If any person having sufficient means neglects or refuses to maintain, (a) his wife, unable to maintain herself to, (b) his legitimate or illegitimate minor child, whether married or not, unable to maintain…

Maintenance under the CrPC

Section 125 does not aim to benefit those belonging to any particular religion, its use by Muslim wives was curtailed by the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986. However, according to a report in the Indian Express, the High Court of Bombay…

Smt. Poonam Gupta vs Ghanshyam Gupta

Allahabad High Court Smt. Poonam Gupta vs Ghanshyam Gupta on 9/10/2002 JUDGMENT Vineet Saran, J. 1. These two appeals arise out of the same Judgment and order dated   30.3.2001 passed by the Principal Judge, Family Court, Kanpur Nagar. By   the impugned order, the…

Well qualified wife is not entitled to Maintenance who remain idle

Madhya Pradesh High Court Smt. Mamta Jaiswal vs Rajesh Jaiswal on 24/3/2000 ORDER J.G. Chitre, J. 1. Heard. The petitioner Mamta Jaiswal has acquired qualification as M.Sc., M.C., M.Ed. and was working in Gulamnabi Azad College of Education, Pusad,   Dist. Yeotmal (MHS). The husband…

VIKAS & ORS. Vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

CASE NO.:Appeal (crl.)  321 of 2006 PETITIONER:VIKAS & ORS. RESPONDENT:STATE OF MAHARASHTRA DATE OF JUDGMENT: 21/01/2008 BENCH:C.K. THAKKER & MARKANDEY KATJU JUDGMENT:J U D G M E N T C.K. Thakker, J. 1.The present appeal is filed by the appellants-accused against judgment and order passed…

SUNITA JAIN Vs. PAWAN KUMAR JAIN & ORS.(498A)

CASE NO.:Appeal (crl.)  174 of 2008 PETITIONER:SUNITA JAIN RESPONDENT:PAWAN KUMAR JAIN & ORS. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 25/01/2008 BENCH:C.K. THAKKER & D.K. JAIN JUDGMENT:J U D G M E N T ARISING OUT OF SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRL.) NO. 1362 OF 2004 C.K. THAKKER, J. 1.  Leave…

Gaurav Nagpal VS Sumedha Nagpal – Custody

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION – CIVIL APPEAL NO. 5099 OF 2007 Gaurav Nagpal …Appellant Versus Sumedha Nagpal ….Respondent (With Criminal Appeal NO. 491 of 2006) JUDGMENT Dr. ARIJIT PASAYAT, J. 1. Challenge in this appeal is to the judgment of…

Krishan Jeet Singh vs State Of Haryana

Punjab-Haryana High Court    Krishan Jeet Singh vs State Of Haryana on 3/10/2002 JUDGMENT    Nirmal Singh, J.    1. The petitioners were charge-sheeted Under Sections 406, 498A, I.P.C.    vide order dated 8.2.2000 on the ground that they have harassed and    humiliated the complainant…

Copyright © 2019 MyNation KnowledgeBase
eXTReMe Tracker
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

Web Design BangladeshWeb Design BangladeshMymensingh