MyNation KnowledgeBase

Landmark Judgments and Articles on Law

Annulment of marriage – Non consummation of marriage

HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Matrimonial Appeal No.4 of 2013 Decided on : 15th March, 2013 SAHIL BANSAL …… Appellant Through: Mr. Alok Kumar & Neeraj Gupta, Advocates. Versus VASUDHA …… Respondent Through: Ms. Manali Singhal, Ms. Monika Singhal and Mr. Prakhar Nishant,…

Divorce by Mutual Consent when wife has withdrawn her Consent for Divorce

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR JUDGMENT Anil Khatwani vs. Nistha Khatwani S.B.CIVIL MISC. APPEAL NO. 1250/2008 DATE OF JUDGMENT : 10th May, 2012. PRESENT HON’BLE DR.JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI Dr.Sachin Acharya, for the appellant – husband. Mr. T.R.Singh Sodha, for the…

Wife can make application for Maintenance u/s 24 of HM Act even though Maintenance is granted to her in Application u/s 125 of CrPC

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 25.08.2009 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.SASIDHARAN C.R.P.(P.D.) No.4001/2008 Amutha @ Symaladevi : Petitioner Vs. K.Thirumoorthy @ Thirumalaisamy : Respondent PRAYER: Revision filed against the order dated 18.09.2008, made in I.A.No.92/2008 in H.M.O.P.No.234/2008 on the file of…

Wife divorced for committing Adultery not entitled to Maintenance

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2547 OF 2016 Sanjivani xxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxx .. Petitioner vs. 1. Ramchandra xxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxx & anr … Respondents 2. State of Maharashtra — with CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2546 OF 2016 Sanjivani xxxxxxxxx…

Mere Registration of an Agreement of Marriage is not Sufficient to Prove the Marriage

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 3050 OF 2010 RATHNAMMA & ORS. …..APPELLANT(S) VERSUS SUJATHAMMA & ORS. …..RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT HEMANT GUPTA, J. 1. Defendant No.2, defendant No.5 and legal heirs of defendant No.4 are in appeal aggrieved against the…

Divorce – Desertion Proved.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO.133 OF 2006 X …Appellant vs Y …Respondent. Mr N.V.Gangal for a Appellant Mr Anilkumar Patil for a Respondent. CORAM : A.S.OKA AND S.C. GUPTE, JJ. Reserved on 09/12/2013 Pronounced on…

Permanent alimony denied under Sec 25 HMA, No proof of cruelty.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH A.F.R. RESERVED Case :- FIRST APPEAL No. – 72 of 2004 Appellant :- Smt. Archana Sharma Respondent :- Mukesh Kumar Sharma Counsel for Appellant :- S.C. Srivastava,Manoj K Jaiswal,Satish Chandra Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- S.C. Shukla,Indrajeet…

Decree for restitution of conjugal rights enforces cohabitation but it cannot force Sexual intercourse

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: October 04, 2016 Judgment Delivered on: October 07, 2016 MAT.APP.(F.C.) 64/2015 SUDHA GUPTA ….. Appellant Represented by: Mr.Om Saran Gupta, Advocate versus HAR PRASAD GUPTA ….. Respondent Represented by: Respondent in person CORAM:…

When Challenging decree for restitution of conjugal rights under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act infructuous

Andhra High Court F.C.A. Nos.176 OF 2008 AND 60 OF 2010 14-07-2014 Smt.K.Kavith… Appellant Shiva Shankar.. Respondent Counsel for the appellant: Dr. P.B. Vijay Kumar Counsel for the respondent:Sri A. Chandraiah Naidu Sri K. Chaitanya <GIST: HEAD NOTE: CASES REFERRED: 1. 1977 AIR 2218 2….

Whether Hindu lady marrying a Hindu male carrying a rightly married mother entitled to maintenance?

Supreme Court of India PETITIONER:SMT. YAMUNABAI ANANTRAo ADHAV Vs. RESPONDENT: RANANTRAO SHIVRAM ADHAV AND ANOTHER DATE OF JUDGMENT27/01/1988 BENCH: SHARMA, L.M. (J) MISRA RANGNATH CITATION: 1988 AIR 644 1988 SCR (2) 809 1988 SCC (1) 530 JT 1988 (1) 193 1988 SCALE (1)184 ACT: Criminal Procedure…

Copyright © 2020 MyNation KnowledgeBase
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, though No Lawyer will give we Advice like We do

Please review Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You determine afterwards Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We hoop Women Centric inequitable laws like False Section 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation