MyNation KnowledgeBase

Landmark Judgments and Articles on Law

498A Quash against Aged In-laws for Vague Allegations & Time Limitation

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR QUASHING & SET ASIDE FIR/ORDER) NO. 11812 of 2013 MARGARET JASUBHAI CHAUHAN & 1….Applicant(s) Versus STATE OF GUJARAT & 1….Respondent(s) Appearance: MR SR YADAV, ADVOCATE for the Applicant(s) No. 1 – 2 HCLS COMMITTEE,…

P&HC – 498A / 406 Chargesheet Quash against In-Laws – Husband Declared as PO

Summary   As usual, Wife filed 498A/406 & combo IPCs against husband & family members Petitioners are MIL, FIL & BIL who prefered to Quash the Chargesheet. Parents contented that they have disown the son and residing separately for last 9 years Honorable P&H HC…

Rejection of Quashing u/s 482 Cr.P.C cannot be a ground for dismissing Discharge Application u/s 239 crpc

Summary   Parents-In-Laws filed discharge application under Crpc 239, Magistrate dismissed it without citing specific reasons or finding Revisional Court upheld the dismissal order of Trial court. Aggrieved by this Parents-in-law moved to HC Honorable Jharkhand HC stated that “The revisional court was also supposed…

In-Laws can’t be implicated in 498A, If basic ingredient of harassment & torture is missing in the allegation

Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side) Smt. Aparajita Bhowmick Nee … vs State Of W.B on 10 November, 2016 CRR 3067 of 2013 with CRR 3065 of 2013 Smt. Aparajita Bhowmick nee Bandopadhyay Vs. State of W.B. Mr. Tapas Kr. Bhattacharya Mr. Debabrata Chakraborty …………. for…

Sister-in-law 498A quash

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc. No.M-31712 of 2004 Date of Decision: 23.05.2011 Santosh Jakhar….Petitioner Versus State of Haryana & another…Respondents CORAM : Hon’ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present:- Mr. Salil Bali, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sidharth Sarup,…

498A quash,s482,In-laws, and Territorial jurisdiction

Supreme Court of India CASE NO.:Appeal (crl.) 372 of 2005 PETITIONER:Ramesh and Ors. RESPONDENT:State of Tamil Nadu DATE OF JUDGMENT: 03/03/2005 BENCH:P. Venkatarama Reddi & A.K. Mathur JUDGMENT:JUDGMENT ORDER Leave granted. The two appeals filed by five accused (three in one case and two in…

Copyright © 2019 MyNation KnowledgeBase
eXTReMe Tracker
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

Web Design BangladeshWeb Design BangladeshMymensingh