MyNation KnowledgeBase

Landmark Judgments and Articles on Law

Tag: interlocutory application

Parents are Better Guardians of a Child than Grand Parents

Posted on      by      Leave a comment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 03rd DAY OF JULY, 2019 PRESENT THE HON’BLE MRS.JUSTICE B.V.NAGARATHNA AND THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K.NATARAJAN M.F.A. No.9692 OF 2018 (GW) BETWEEN: M.V. KRISHNA MURTHY AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS S/O. LATE VARADHARAJAN, #227, 53RD…

Continue Reading… Parents are Better Guardians of a Child than Grand Parents

Accused acquitted of offence under Section 302 convicted under Section 201 IPC on abject failure to offer any explanation about their conduct

Posted on      by      1 Comment

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1617 OF 2011 Asar Mohammad and Ors. …..Appellant(s) :Versus: The State of U.P. ….Respondent(s) J U D G M E N T A.M. Khanwilkar, J. 1. This appeal emanates from the judgment and…

Continue Reading… Accused acquitted of offence under Section 302 convicted under Section 201 IPC on abject failure to offer any explanation about their conduct

What is difference between mental illness and mental retardation?

Posted on      by      Leave a comment

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Civil Appeal No. 10463 of 2017 Decided On: 17.08.2017 Z Vs The State of Bihar and Ors. Hon’ble Judges/Coram: Dipak Misra, Amitava Roy and A.M. Khanwilkar, JJ. Citation: ( 2018) 11 SCC 572 1. An interlocutory application being I.A. No….

Continue Reading… What is difference between mental illness and mental retardation?

Whether application for amendment is subject to period of limitation?

Posted on      by      Leave a comment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O. O. C. J. APPEAL NO.200 OF 2012 IN CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.106 OF 2010 IN SUIT NO.2256 OF 1998 WITH CROL NO.4 OF 2012 Mr.Vijay Agarwal & Ors. …Appellants. Vs. Harinarayan G.Bajaj & Ors. …Respondents. Mr.Dinyar D.Madon,…

Continue Reading… Whether application for amendment is subject to period of limitation?

Interception of conversation amounts to intrusion on the privacy

Posted on      by      Leave a comment

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.39 OF 2006 Amar Singh …Petitioner(s) – Versus – Union of India and others …Respondent(s) J U D G M E N T GANGULY, J. 1. In this writ petition, filed under Article…

Continue Reading… Interception of conversation amounts to intrusion on the privacy

Divorce : Spouse denying to submit to sex. Cruelty

Posted on      by      Leave a comment

Supreme Court of India PETITIONER:V. BHAGAT Vs. RESPONDENT:D. BHAGAT DATE OF JUDGMENT19/11/1993 BENCH:JEEVAN REDDY, B.P. (J) KULDIP SINGH (J) CITATION: ACT: HEADNOTE: JUDGMENT: The Judgment of the Court was delivered by B.P. JEEVAN REDDY, J.- This is an unusual case calling for an unusual solution….

Continue Reading… Divorce : Spouse denying to submit to sex. Cruelty

Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link
MyNation Times Magzine
All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Important SC/HC Judgements on 498A IPC
Rules and Regulations of India.

STUDY REPORTS

Dowry Law Proposal.
Report on 498A.
Report on DVAct
Report on Indian Husbands.
eMpower Women by DiseMpowering Men
MyNation Proposal for Paternity Act
Study Report on Marital Rape
MISUSE OF ANTI-DOWRY LAWS IN MARITAL DISPUTES
CopyRight @ MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Section 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation